Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40867392›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Spontaneous vs. Strategic Guilt: Guilt Communication in Repairing Trust with Different Severities of Violations.

Binghai Sun, Chuanyu Yang, Yuqi Feng, Shang Jin, Ningmeng Cao, Guoan Yue

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Binghai SunZhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321001, China.
Chuanyu YangZhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321001, China.
Yuqi FengZhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321001, China.
Shang JinZhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321001, China.
Ningmeng CaoZhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321001, China.
Guoan YueZhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321001, China.

Funding

the Postdoctoral Fellowship Program of CPSF GZC20241533
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Previous research has predominantly focused on the impact of emotions on trust repair, yet has largely neglected how the manner of emotional communication influences this process. Centering on guilt-the emotion most commonly experienced by transgressors following a trust breach-this study examines whether spontaneous versus strategic guilt communication exerts differential effects on trust repair, and explores how the severity of the trust violation moderates this relationship. Study 1 compared the trust repair efficacy of spontaneous and strategic guilt communication. Study 2 tested the moderating role of violation severity. Results from Study 1 indicated that spontaneous guilt communication facilitated significantly greater trust repair than strategic communication. Study 2 further revealed that this advantage emerged only when the trust violation was severe. These findings advance theoretical understanding of guilt as a trust repair strategy and offer practical guidance for nurturing and restoring trust in interpersonal contexts, thereby promoting relational harmony.

Indexed as

severity of trust violationspontaneous guilt communicationstrategic guilt communicationtrust repair

Identifiers

PMID40867392
PMCPMC12383218

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.