Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40867382›Full record

ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Moralizing Consent: Three Field Studies Testing a Student-Led Intervention at University Parties.

Ana P Gantman, Ajua Duker, Jordan G Starck, Alex Sanchez, Elizabeth Levy Paluck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ana P GantmanDepartment of Psychology, Brooklyn College, Brooklyn, NY 11210, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5301-548X
Ajua DukerDepartment of Psychology, New York University, New York, NY 10012, USA.
Jordan G StarckDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5503-1283
Alex SanchezDepartment of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6853-7726
Elizabeth Levy PaluckDepartment of Psychology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544, USA.

Funding

the Canadian Institute for Advanced Research SIW-PALU-162318
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Moralization is the process by which preferences become moral values. We investigated a practice that is changing its moral status on college campuses in the United States: affirmative consent to sexual activity. We tested whether messages given to students just before they entered a party impacted their thinking about consent in moral terms-i.e., as a clear issue, with broad consensus, and an imperative to action. At two social clubs on a college campus in 2017, we randomly assigned moralistic vs. informational messages about consent, delivered at the party's door. At the club that had pre-existing messaging about consent, the moralistic (vs. informational) message increased students' thinking about consent in moral terms. By contrast, in the club without prior consent messaging, the informational (vs. moralistic) pledge increased students' thinking about consent in moral terms. We then investigated and found weak evidence for a small reduction in administrative-level student conduct complaints compared to prior and subsequent years as a result of a one-night consent message treatment unique to each of the 12 clubs hosting a party. Theoretically, our findings make progress toward understanding processes of moralization. Pragmatically, they suggest the importance of locally tailored messages that reflect and shape the values of social groups.

Indexed as

consentfield experimentmoralizationnormssexual violence

Identifiers

PMID40867382
PMCPMC12382995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.