ArticleBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Effect of Narrative Intervention with Strategy Instruction on the Listening and Reading Comprehension of Children with Autism.
Article in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An Auditory-Vocal Package for Story Recall in Chinese Children with Autism: Evaluating Forward Chaining and Emergent Divergent-Convergent Relations.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Visual guidance patterns and comprehension mechanisms in children's nonlinear picture book reading: an eye-tracking study.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Some children with autism may require additional support to meet academic expectations for comprehension. Because an extensive set of research links oral narration to listening and reading comprehension, the promotion of narrative-based skills may be a viable intervention approach. The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of narrative intervention with explicit strategy instruction on the listening and reading retells of children with autism after hearing and decoding novel stories. Four children with autism aged 7 and 9 years old participated in this multiple baseline across participants single-case experimental design study. Behavioral therapists delivered the narrative intervention, which included explicit instruction on the use of story grammar icons, to each child individually within the course of their therapy. Results showed that all participants improved their listening (TauU ES range = 0.64-1.06) and reading (TauU ES range = 0.72-1.15) retells, but they required extended use of the icon strategy to achieve the most benefit. When icons were completely removed, three of the four participants performed above baseline levels on the listening and reading comprehension measures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.