Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40867362›Full record

ReviewBehavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Psychoeducation for Suicidal Behaviors in Inpatient Settings: A Scoping Review.

Laura Fusar-Poli, Camilla Figini, Francesca Moioli, Caterina Marchesi, Ana Kovic, Pierluigi Politi, Natascia Brondino

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laura Fusar-PoliDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Via Bassi 21, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5847-6947
Camilla FiginiDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Via Bassi 21, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0009-0002-0624-6987
Francesca MoioliDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Via Bassi 21, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Caterina MarchesiDepartment of Mental Health and Addiction, Azienda Socio-Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST) Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Ana KovicDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Via Bassi 21, 27100 Pavia, Italy.
Pierluigi PolitiDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Via Bassi 21, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-4602-2032
Natascia BrondinoDepartment of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Via Bassi 21, 27100 Pavia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3128-1592

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

(1) Background: Suicide is a worldwide leading cause of death among people with mental disorders. Psychoeducation is an integral component of mental health care that may offer patients valuable tools to understand their conditions, develop coping strategies, and engage more effectively in the treatment process. In the present scoping review, we aimed to summarize the evidence on the implementation of psychoeducational interventions in inpatient settings after suicide attempts. (2) Methods: In August 2024, we searched the Web of Knowledge (all databases), PsycINFO, and CINAHL databases following the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. We included original articles evaluating the effects of psychoeducational interventions for patients hospitalized in psychiatric settings after a suicide attempt. We provided a narrative synthesis of the study characteristics and the main findings of the included studies. (3) Results: We included five papers reporting the results of six studies, of which two were randomized controlled trials. Participants were diagnosed with diverse mental disorders, and interventions were generally short in the hospitalization phase, with follow-ups in the short or long term. Outcomes were focused on suicidal ideation, depressive symptoms, and general functioning, along with feasibility and acceptability of the intervention. Psychoeducational interventions were generally well accepted, but more evidence is needed to determine their efficacy. (4) Conclusions: Psychoeducational intervention in an inpatient psychiatric setting may be important for the prevention of future suicide attempts. Nevertheless, research on the topic is still scarce. Methodologically sound randomized controlled trials evaluating the long-term efficacy of psychoeducational interventions on suicide prevention are needed. Future research should also investigate the utility of psychoeducation in non-psychiatric inpatient settings.

Indexed as

hospitalizationinpatientpreventionpsychoeducationreviewself-injurysuicide

Identifiers

PMID40867362
PMCPMC12383175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.