ArticleCancers2025
Baseline Hemostatic Biomarker Assessment Identifies Breast Cancer Patients at High Risk for Venous Thromboembolism During Chemotherapy.
Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Biomarkers of Hypercoagulability and Thromboinflammation in Cervical Cancer-Associated Thrombosis: A Systematic Review with Translational Insights from Breast Cancer.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Pooled it
- Analysis of drug-induced pulmonary embolism risk based on the Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System database.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
Abstract
(1) Background: The presence of metastatic disease significantly increases the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in breast cancer, particularly during chemotherapy. Although not categorized as a highly thrombogenic malignancy, the elevated global prevalence of this cancer places a substantial number of patients at risk of thrombosis, which cannot yet be accurately predicted by validated risk assessment models (RAMs), highlighting the need for a dedicated model. (2) Aim: This study aims to develop a RAM for VTE in newly diagnosed metastatic breast cancer patients enrolled in a prospective, observational, and multicenter study. (3) Methods: A cohort of 189 patients beginning antitumor therapy were enrolled and prospectively monitored for VTE and mortality. Blood samples collected at enrollment were tested for D-dimer, fibrinogen, FVIII, prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (F1 + 2), and thrombin generation (TG). Competing risk analyses were performed to identify significant predictors. (4) Results: Within one year, the cumulative incidences of VTE and mortality were 7.0% and 12%, respectively. Univariable analysis identified high Ki-67, D-dimer, FVIII, fibrinogen, and TG levels, along with low hemoglobin levels, as independent predictors of VTE. Only Ki-67, fibrinogen, FVIII, and hemoglobin were retained as significant predictors in multivariable analysis. These variables were further examined by multiple linear regression, which revealed Ki-67 and fibrinogen as the most significant parameters. A continuous RAM was then developed based on Ki-67 and fibrinogen (c-statistics 0.78), categorizing patients into low-risk and high-risk groups for VTE (2% vs. 13%; SHR 3.6,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.