Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40867274›Full record

ArticleCancers2025

Off-Clamp Robotic-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy: Retrospective Comparative Analysis from a Large Italian Multicentric Series.

Angelo Porreca, Filippo Marino, Davide De Marchi, Marco Giampaoli, Francesca Simonetti, Antonio Amodeo, Paolo Corsi, Francesco Claps, Daniele Romagnoli, Alessandro Crestani and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Angelo PorrecaDepartment of Urology, Humanitas Gavazzeni, 24125 Bergamo, Italy.
Filippo MarinoDepartment of Urology, Humanitas Gavazzeni, 24125 Bergamo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2908-6907
Davide De MarchiDepartment of Urology, Humanitas Gavazzeni, 24125 Bergamo, Italy.
Marco GiampaoliDepartment of Urology, Humanitas Gavazzeni, 24125 Bergamo, Italy.
Francesca SimonettiDepartment of Urology, Humanitas Gavazzeni, 24125 Bergamo, Italy.
Antonio AmodeoDepartment of Urology, Veneto Institute of Oncology-IOV IRCCS, 35128 Padua, Italy.ORCID 0009-0009-2730-0402
Paolo CorsiDepartment of Urology, Veneto Institute of Oncology-IOV IRCCS, 35128 Padua, Italy.
Francesco ClapsDepartment of Urology, Veneto Institute of Oncology-IOV IRCCS, 35128 Padua, Italy.
Daniele RomagnoliDepartment of Urology, Policlinico Abano Terme, 35031 Abano Terme, Italy.
Alessandro CrestaniDepartment of Urology, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Friuli Centrale, 33100 Udine, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7443-8740
Luca Di GianfrancescoDepartment of Urology, Humanitas Gavazzeni, 24125 Bergamo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0564-7415

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate the perioperative outcomes, functional impact, and oncologic efficacy of off-clamp robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) in patients with renal masses across multiple high-volume centers. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe conducted a retrospective multicenter study including 563 patients (group 1) who underwent clampless RAPN between January 2018 and December 2024. Patients with solitary kidneys, tumors >7 cm, or prior renal surgery were excluded. The standardized surgical technique involved tumor resection without clamping of the renal artery, followed by the use of hemostatic agents and standard/selective suturing of the resection bed on demand. Patients in group 1 were compared to 244 consecutive patients treated in the same centres and treated with RAPN with an on-clamp procedure (group 2). Primary outcomes included operative time, blood loss, and complications, while secondary outcomes assessed renal function preservation and oncologic control at an at least 12-month follow-up.

resultsThe median operative time was 118 min (IQR: 100-140 min), and median estimated blood loss was 150 mL (range: 50-400 mL). The overall complication rate was 9.2%, with most classified as Clavien-Dindo Grade I-II. No intraoperative conversions to open surgery were recorded. Renal function was well preserved, with a median estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline of 4.1% at three months (

conclusionsThe off-clamp RAPN is a safe and effective nephron-sparing approach, offering significant renal function preservation while maintaining oncologic efficacy. This technique minimizes ischemia-reperfusion injury and post-surgical fibrosis, providing a viable alternative to on-clamp RAPN. Further prospective trials are warranted to confirm long-term benefits and refine patient selection criteria.

Indexed as

ischemia-free nephrectomyoff-clampon-clamponcologic controlrenal function preservationrobotic-assisted partial nephrectomyrobotic nephrectomy outcomes

Identifiers

PMID40867274
PMCPMC12385006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.