ReviewBrain sciences2025
The Crucial Interplay Between the Lungs, Brain, and Heart to Understand Epilepsy-Linked SUDEP: A Literature Review.
Review in Brain sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sudden unexpected death in epilepsy: An Italian expert consensus statement on risk, mechanisms, prevention, and therapeutic strategies.Epilepsia open · 2026Article
- Epilepsy-induced heart damage and sudep risk: ion channelopathies, calcium homeostasis, and the therapeutic potential of resveratrol.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Article
- The Role of Loss-of-Function KCNH2 Variants in Cardiac Arrhythmias, Seizures and the Risk of Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy.Journal of neurochemistry · 2026Review
- Pathophysiological frameworks and emerging preventative strategies in SUDEP.Frontiers in neurology · 2026Review
- Investigating effects of acute severe hypoxia and p38 MAPK inhibition on boldness and anxiety-like behavior in zebrafish larvae.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is a leading cause of mortality among individuals with epilepsy, particularly those with drug-resistant forms. This review explores the complex multisystem mechanisms underpinning SUDEP, integrating recent findings on brain, cardiac, and pulmonary dysfunctions. BACKGROUND/
objectivesThe main objective of this review is to elucidate how seizures disrupt critical physiological systems, especially the brainstem, heart, and lungs, contributing to SUDEP, with emphasis on respiratory control failure and autonomic instability.
methodsThe literature from experimental models, clinical observations, neuroimaging studies, and genetic analyses was systematically examined.
resultsSUDEP is frequently preceded by generalized tonic-clonic seizures, which trigger central and obstructive apnea, hypoventilation, and cardiac arrhythmias. Brainstem dysfunction, particularly in areas such as the pre-Bötzinger complex and nucleus tractus solitarius, plays a central role. Genetic mutations affecting ion channels (e.g., SCN1A, KCNQ1) and neurotransmitter imbalances (notably serotonin and GABA) exacerbate autonomic dysregulation. Risk is compounded by a prone sleeping position, reduced arousal capacity, and impaired ventilatory responses.
conclusionsSUDEP arises from a cascade of interrelated failures in respiratory and cardiac regulation initiated by seizure activity. The recognition of modifiable risk factors, implementation of monitoring technologies, and targeted therapies such as serotonergic agents may reduce mortality. Multidisciplinary approaches integrating neurology, cardiology, and respiratory medicine are essential for effective prevention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.