ArticleBrain sciences2025
Enhanced Brain Stroke Lesion Segmentation in MRI Using a 2.5D Transformer Backbone U-Net Model.
Article in Brain sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- GDNet: A Robust 2.5D Multimodal MRI Brain Tumor Segmentation Framework with EMA Stabilization and Tumor-Aware Sampling.Journal of imaging · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND/
objectivesAccurate segmentation of brain stroke lesions from MRI images is a critical task in medical image analysis that is essential for timely diagnosis and treatment planning.
methodsThis paper presents a novel approach for segmenting brain stroke lesions using a deep learning model based on the U-Net neural network architecture. We enhanced the traditional U-Net by integrating a transformer-based backbone, specifically the Mix Vision Transformer (MiT), and compared its performance against other commonly used backbones such as ResNet and EfficientNet. Additionally, we implemented a 2.5D method, which leverages 2D networks to process three-dimensional data slices, effectively balancing the rich spatial context of 3D methods and the simplicity of 2D methods. The 2.5D approach captures inter-slice dependencies, leading to improved lesion delineation without the computational complexity of full 3D models. Utilizing the 2015 ISLES dataset, which includes MRI images and corresponding lesion masks for 20 patients, we conducted our experiments with 4-fold cross-validation to ensure robustness and reliability. To evaluate the effectiveness of our method, we conducted comparative experiments with several state-of-the-art (SOTA) segmentation models, including CNN-based UNet, nnU-Net, TransUNet, and SwinUNet.
resultsOur proposed model outperformed all competing methods in terms of Dice Coefficient and Intersection over Union (IoU), demonstrating its robustness and superiority. Our extensive experiments demonstrate that the proposed U-Net with the MiT Backbone, combined with 2.5D data preparation, achieves superior performance metrics, specifically achieving DICE and IoU scores of 0.8153 ± 0.0101 and 0.7835 ± 0.0079, respectively, outperforming other backbone configurations.
conclusionsThese results indicate that the integration of transformer-based backbones and 2.5D techniques offers a significant advancement in the accurate segmentation of brain stroke lesions, paving the way for more reliable and efficient diagnostic tools in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.