ReviewBrain sciences2025
The Olfactory Bulbectomy Model of Depression: Brief History, Current Status and Critique.
Review in Brain sciences, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Role of neural oscillations in depression: highlights on gamma oscillations.Translational psychiatry · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
In the last several decades, a number of animal models of neurological diseases have been proposed and validated to one degree or another. This review focuses on the olfactory bulbectomized rodent as a model of major depression, a disorder that, because of its prevalence, has been called the "common cold" of neurological diseases, though the disability it causes is far more profound. After describing the method, a brief history of this model and the various validity claims made for it are discussed. Though a legion of physiological and biochemical sequelae of bulbectomy and other animal models of depression have been reported, the focus of this review is behavioral. Therefore, the neurochemical and molecular aspects of the depression models mentioned in this review will not be explored in depth. Lastly, unresolved questions posed by the bulbectomy model are considered along with its utility in the study of other neurological diseases and its future prospects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.