Observational studyThe clinical respiratory journal2025
Comparative Evaluation of Pleural Fluid Cholesterol and Total Protein Versus Light's Criteria in Differentiation of Exudates and Transudates: A Cross-Sectional Analysis at Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital.
Observational study in The clinical respiratory journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPleural effusions are very common clinical findings in clinical practice. Their proper diagnosis based on different parameters like pleural fluid protein, LDH, ADA, and cholesterol is very important. Light's criteria, though used as a standard method in differentiating pleural effusions as exudates and transudates, usually misidentifies 15%-20% of transudates as exudates. Hence, the role of other criteria like combined pleural fluid cholesterol and total protein in the differentiation of pleural fluid is studied in this study. The objectives of our study are to determine the role of combined pleural fluid cholesterol and total protein in the differentiation of exudates and transudates in cases presenting in Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital.
methodsThis is a single-centered, analytical, cross-sectional, observational study. This is carried out among patients who are diagnosed as a case of pleural effusions from the emergency ward and respiratory ward of Tribhuvan University Teaching Hospital. Data collection was started after ethical approval was taken from IRB. The data were analyzed through SPSS version 22 for data analysis.
resultsTotal of 90 patients with pleural effusion were enrolled in this study. Out of 90 patients, 49 patients were male, and 41 patients were female. The mean age of patients was 52.86 (±17.90) years. Tuberculosis was the most common disease associated with effusions, followed by pneumonia and malignancy. Based on Light's criteria, 65 (72.2%), pleural effusions were found to be exudates, and 25 were found to be transudates, with sensitivity and specificity of 98.4% and 85.7%, respectively. According to pleural fluid total protein, it classified 62.2% [n = 56] of cases as exudates and 37.8% [n = 34] of cases as transudates. Sensitivity and specificity were 88.7% and 96.4%, respectively. Based on pleural fluid cholesterol, 64.4% [n = 58] of cases were shown as exudates and 35.6% [n = 32] of cases as transudates, with sensitivity and specificity of 93.5% and 100%, respectively. Combined pleural total protein and cholesterol, however, classified 57.8% [n = 52] of cases as exudates and 42.2% [n = 38] of cases as transudates, with sensitivity and specificity of 83.9% and 100%, respectively.
conclusionThough Light's criteria remain the gold standard for distinguishing transudates from exudates, combined pleural fluid cholesterol and total protein examination improve diagnostic accuracy in circumstances where the diagnosis on discharge differs from the outcome from Light's criteria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.