ArticleNucleic acids research2025
Optimal sequencing depth for measuring the concentrations of molecular barcodes.
Article in Nucleic acids research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In combinatorial genetic engineering experiments, next-generation sequencing (NGS) allows for measuring the concentrations of barcoded or mutated genes within highly diverse libraries. When designing and interpreting these experiments, sequencing depths are thus important parameters to take into account. Service providers follow established guidelines to determine NGS depth depending on the type of experiment, such as RNA sequencing or whole genome sequencing. However, guidelines specifically tailored for measuring barcode concentrations have not yet reached an accepted consensus. To address this issue, we combine the analysis of NGS datasets from barcoded libraries with a mathematical model taking into account the polymerase chain reaction amplification in library preparation. We demonstrate on several datasets that noise in the NGS counts increases with the sequencing depth; consequently, beyond certain limits, deeper sequencing does not improve the precision of measuring barcode concentrations. We propose, as rule of thumb, that the optimal sequencing depth should be about ten times the initial amount of barcoded DNA molecules before any amplification step.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.