ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025
A heart failure classification model from radial artery pulse wave using LSTM neural networks.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Non-invasive classification of stable HFpEF using a deep learning model trained on acoustic features of sustained vowels.Biomedical engineering online · 2026Article
- Multimodal deep learning for cardiovascular disease detection using pulse wave and vocal signals: a prediction model development and validation study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Development and validation of a nomogram model integrating noninvasive detection of radial pulse wave for predicting diabetic foot risk in type 2 diabetes mellitus.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- PSO-BiLSTM-Attention: An Interpretable Deep Learning Model Optimized by Particle Swarm Optimization for Accurate Ischemic Heart Disease Incidence Forecasting.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHeart failure (HF) represents a pressing global health issue demanding innovative and accessible approaches for early detection. Non-invasive, rapid, and cost-effective techniques utilizing deep learning (DL) hold significant promise for addressing this challenge.
methodsThis study included 462 participants categorized into healthy, coronary artery disease (CAD), and HF groups. Raw radial artery pulse wave data underwent preprocessing, including denoising, normalization, and SMOTE-based balancing. Four deep learning algorithms adept at handling sequential data - Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM), Convolutional Neural Network (CNN), Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), and Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory (Bi-LSTM) - were subsequently applied and evaluated for their classification performance. A 10-fold cross-validation strategy was employed to ensure a robust evaluation of model performance and stability.
resultsTo robustly evaluate performance and stability, a 10-fold cross-validation was performed. The LSTM model yielded the highest mean accuracy (0.8595 ± 0.0522) and demonstrated strong performance across other key metrics, including a high Area Under the Curve, establishing it as the most effective model in this study. To enhance model interpretability, the SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) framework was utilized to determine global feature importance and explain the final LSTM model's predictions.
conclusionOur findings strongly suggest that an LSTM-based model analyzing radial artery pulse waves can effectively differentiate between healthy, CAD, and HF states. This approach represents a simple, non-invasive, and cost-effective methodology with significant potential as a valuable strategy to aid in the early screening and detection of HF. Further investigation and broader clinical validation are warranted to confirm the robustness and real-world applicability of this promising tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.