Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40866970›Full record

ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2025

Predicting peripheral venous catheter related phlebitis using machine learning (PPML): development and prospective validation of PPML for cardiology inpatients.

Koen Welvaars, Femke Groenendaal, Michel P J van den Bekerom, Job N Doornberg, Ernst P van Haarst, Robert Riezebos

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Koen WelvaarsData Science Team, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. k.welvaars01@umcg.nl.
Femke GroenendaalQuality and Improvement Team, Department of Cardiology, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Michel P J van den BekeromDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Behavioural and Movement Sciences, OLVG, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Job N DoornbergDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, UMCG, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Ernst P van HaarstDepartment of Urology, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Robert RiezebosHeart Centre, Department of Cardiology, OLVG, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeripheral venous catheter use is a common healthcare practice and carries risk for peripheral venous catheter-related phlebitis (PVCP). The aims of this study were to develop a machine learning model using inpatient hospital data to accurately predict the risk of PVCP and apply this model for early identification to reduce the risk of PVCP in the department of Cardiology.

methodsA prediction model was developed to estimate the risk of developing PVCP within 3–24 h after introduction during a clinical admission in the department of Cardiology. Data of 107.419 generic hospital clinical admissions between January 2017 and December 2020 were used. For evaluating generalizability of the model, 1.199 clinical admissions between January 2021 and May 2021 from Cardiology were used as validation dataset. For prospectively evaluating clinical utility, 9.885 admissions between May 2021 and December 2022 of Cardiology were used.

resultsOur results demonstrate a strong-performing model with an AUC of 0.89 (CI: 0.87–0.91) based on the test set, and an AUC of 0.72 (CI: 0.66–0.78) based on the validation data. A significant descending trend in the incidence of PVCP in long stay admissions (p-value of 0. 01) was observed during prospective evaluation.

conclusionsThe early identification proves beneficial in reducing the risk of PVCP significantly for patients with long-stay admissions in the Cardiology department.

Indexed as

Catheterization, PeripheralMachine LearningPhlebitisAgedFemaleHumansInpatientsMaleMiddle AgedPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsProspective StudiesRisk AssessmentClinical utilityMachine learningPhlebitisRandomForest

Identifiers

PMID40866970
PMCPMC12382011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.