Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40866951›Full record

ReviewHuman resources for health2025

Evaluating the impact of field epidemiology training programs: a descriptive review of the published literature.

James A Flint, Tambri Housen, Rachel Hammersley-Mather, Martyn D Kirk, David N Durrheim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Human resources for health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Thirty years of an advanced field epidemiology training programme: a mixed-methods evaluation, Germany, 1996 to 2025.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

James A FlintUniversity of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia. james.flint@newcastle.edu.au.
Tambri HousenUniversity of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
Rachel Hammersley-MatherUniversity of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.
Martyn D KirkAustralian National University, Canberra, Australia.
David N DurrheimUniversity of Newcastle, Newcastle, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Field epidemiology training programs (FETPs) are designed to equip public health professionals with the skills necessary to investigate, monitor, and respond to disease outbreaks and other public health emergencies. Since the 1950s, when the first FETP started in the United States, the training model has been adopted by numerous countries around the world. Today, there are 98 FETPs in operation, and over 20,000 graduates. This review assesses published studies that report on the evaluation of FETPs. A literature search yielded 402 records, with 16 publications meeting inclusion criteria after duplicate removal and eligibility screening. The 16 FETP evaluations encompassed 37 national and four regional assessments across 26 countries. Most of the evaluations were descriptive reviews using quantitative methods focusing on outputs and short- or medium-term outcomes. Only four published evaluations focused on longer term impacts of an FETP. The evaluations describe and quantify numerous outputs and outcomes, providing evidence of trainees and graduates applying skills to strengthen core health system functions. Several challenges were also identified, including poor utilisation of FETP graduates by senior management stemming from a limited understanding of what field epidemiologists can contribute to the health system. While these evaluations indicate that FETPs are successful training programs, there are relatively few published impact evaluations providing the level of evidence increasingly expected by funders and stakeholders. There is a need and opportunity to develop tools and resources to support FETP evaluators in the implementation of impact evaluations.

Indexed as

Education, Public Health ProfessionalEpidemiologyProgram EvaluationPublic HealthDisease OutbreaksHumansEvaluationField epidemiology trainingImpact

Identifiers

PMID40866951
PMCPMC12392668

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.