ReviewHuman resources for health2025
Evaluating the impact of field epidemiology training programs: a descriptive review of the published literature.
Review in Human resources for health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Thirty years of an advanced field epidemiology training programme: a mixed-methods evaluation, Germany, 1996 to 2025.Euro surveillance : bulletin Europeen sur les maladies transmissibles = European communicable disease bulletin · 2026Article
- Stakeholder Perspectives on the Learning Model and Skills Application in a Pacific Field Epidemiology Training Program.Hawai'i journal of health & social welfare · 2026Article
- Building epidemiological capacity to strengthen health systems: evaluating the advanced (extended) field epidemiology training program of Papua New Guinea.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Strengthening field epidemiology capacity in Canada: a mixed-methods evaluation of the Canadian field epidemiology program.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- FETP-to-system integration model: a health system resilience model in the Middle East and North Africa.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Priority indicators for evaluating the impact of field epidemiology training programs - results of a global modified Delphi study.BMC public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Field epidemiology training programs (FETPs) are designed to equip public health professionals with the skills necessary to investigate, monitor, and respond to disease outbreaks and other public health emergencies. Since the 1950s, when the first FETP started in the United States, the training model has been adopted by numerous countries around the world. Today, there are 98 FETPs in operation, and over 20,000 graduates. This review assesses published studies that report on the evaluation of FETPs. A literature search yielded 402 records, with 16 publications meeting inclusion criteria after duplicate removal and eligibility screening. The 16 FETP evaluations encompassed 37 national and four regional assessments across 26 countries. Most of the evaluations were descriptive reviews using quantitative methods focusing on outputs and short- or medium-term outcomes. Only four published evaluations focused on longer term impacts of an FETP. The evaluations describe and quantify numerous outputs and outcomes, providing evidence of trainees and graduates applying skills to strengthen core health system functions. Several challenges were also identified, including poor utilisation of FETP graduates by senior management stemming from a limited understanding of what field epidemiologists can contribute to the health system. While these evaluations indicate that FETPs are successful training programs, there are relatively few published impact evaluations providing the level of evidence increasingly expected by funders and stakeholders. There is a need and opportunity to develop tools and resources to support FETP evaluators in the implementation of impact evaluations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.