Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40866932›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2025

Antiresorptive agents in the management of bone metastatic disease: a multicenter mixed-methods study in Palestinian clinical practice.

Neama Daoud, Adan Abu Assa, Bayan Abu Obed, Adan Abu Rabea, Mazen Abdalla, Mohammad Mazoz Jaber, Ramzi Shawahna

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Neama DaoudDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine.
Adan Abu AssaDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine.
Bayan Abu ObedDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine.
Adan Abu RabeaDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine.
Mazen AbdallaDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine. mazen.abdalla@najah.edu.
Mohammad Mazoz JaberDepartment of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine. m.mazouz@najah.edu.
Ramzi ShawahnaDepartment of Physiology, Pharmacology, and Toxicology, Faculty of Medicine and Allied Health Sciences, An-Najah National University, Nablus, Palestine. ramzi_shawahna@hotmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntiresorptive agents are recommended for patients with bone metastatic disease in order to treat hypercalcemia of malignancy, to reduce skeletal-related events, and to alleviate bone pain. This study was conducted to describe prescribing practices for antiresorptive agents among patients with metastatic bone disease within the Palestinian healthcare system.

methodsWe conducted a multicenter, mixed-method study that combined a retrospective analysis of prescription data for antiresorptive agents in patients with metastatic bone disease with a cross-sectional survey of the views and opinions of oncologists and orthopedists practicing within the Palestinian healthcare system regarding the benefits and risks associated with these agents.

resultsIn this study, 239 patients with metastatic bone disease were included. The median age of the patients was 61.0 [52.0-69.0] years, the median duration of cancer was 3.0 [1.0-6.0] years, and the median duration of bone metastatic disease was 1.0 [1.0-3.0] years. Of these patients, 139 (58.2%) received antiresorptive agents. Patients prescribed antiresorptive agents were more likely to experience hypoglycemia (p-value = 0.005) compared to those not receiving these agents. The duration of antiresorptive agent use was positively associated with the duration of cancer (Spearman's rho = 0.38, p-value < 0.001) and with the duration of bone metastatic disease (Spearman's rho = 0.45, p-value < 0.001). Among the surveyed oncologists and orthopedists, 40% reported that prescribing antiresorptive agents for patients with bone metastatic disease was routine practice, while 60% indicated that they would recommend antiresorptive agents even if the patient experienced minimal or no pain. Moreover, 70% of the oncologists and orthopedists preferred initiating treatment with zoledronic acid as the first-line antiresorptive agent for patients with bone metastases.

conclusionOur study revealed significant variability in the prescribing patterns and dosing schedules of antiresorptive agents, highlighting the need to adopt standardized, evidence-based protocols to enhance patient outcomes and optimize resource allocation in managing bone metastatic disease. Furthermore, future research should focus on evaluating patient-centered outcomes, long-term safety profiles, and the impact of educational and regulatory changes on practice patterns.

Indexed as

Bone Density Conservation AgentsBone NeoplasmsPractice Patterns, Physicians'AgedCross-Sectional StudiesDiphosphonatesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMiddle EastQualitative ResearchRetrospective StudiesBone Density Conservation AgentsDiphosphonatesAntiresorptive agentsCancerMetastasisMetastatic bone diseaseOncologyOrthopedics

Identifiers

PMID40866932
PMCPMC12382055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.