Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40866885›Full record

Observational studyTrials2025

Social media recruitment enhances participant diversity in dermatology clinical trial: findings from the SAFA trial.

Cherish Boxall, Susanne Renz, Beth Stuart, Ingrid Muller, Irene Soulsby, Jacqueline Nuttall, Karen Thomas, Kim S Thomas, Tracey H Sach, Megan Lawrence and 9 more

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Trials, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Cherish BoxallSouthampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK. c.e.m.boxall@soton.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7850-233X
Susanne RenzSouthampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Beth StuartSouthampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Ingrid MullerPrimary Care Research Centre, School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Irene SoulsbyPublic Contributor, Southampton, UK.
Jacqueline NuttallSouthampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Karen ThomasPublic Contributor, Southampton, UK.
Kim S ThomasCentre of Evidence Based Dermatology, Lifespan and Population Health, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Tracey H SachPrimary Care Research Centre, School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Megan LawrenceSouthampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Matthew J RiddCentre for Applied Excellence in Skin & Allergy Research, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Nick FrancisPrimary Care Research Centre, School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Paul LittlePrimary Care Research Centre, School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Zina EmintonSouthampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Gareth GriffithsSouthampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Alison M LaytonHull York Medical School, University of York, York, UK.
Alan SajiFaculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Charlotte CluffFaculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.
Miriam SanterPrimary Care Research Centre, School of Primary Care, Population Sciences and Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK.

Funding

Health Technology Assessment Programme 16/13/02
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recruitment and retention of participants remain critical challenges in clinical trials, often requiring innovative approaches to ensure sufficient enrolment and sustained engagement. Social media advertising offers the potential to reach target populations quickly by leveraging demographic, geographic and interest-based targeting. This mixed-methods observational study evaluates participant experiences and the effectiveness of various recruitment routes within a trial of a treatment for acne. Demographic variables, including age, ethnicity, acne severity and acne duration, were stratified primary care, secondary care, community and social media recruitment routes and 12 participant interviews were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. Social media recruitment accounted for over half of participants (53.9%). It was particularly effective in recruiting individuals with higher acne severity (IGA ≥ 3; 57.5% of its recruits, n = 127), longer duration of disease (> 5 years history of acne; 60.2% of its recruits, n = 133) and from ethnic minority groups (9.0% of its recruits, n = 20), the latter being notably higher than the proportion recruited via primary care (1.5% of its recruits, n = 1). Slight variations in retention by recruitment route were observed, with social media (85%) and primary care (84%) achieving the highest retention rate at the 12-week follow-up. All routes lost between 25 and 32% of participants by the 24-week follow-up, signifying the importance of implementing effective retention strategies to keep participants engaged. Overall, participants found targeted social media advertisements to be an acceptable and convenient recruitment approach; initial signals of trust were provided by high-quality graphics and recognisable NHS and university logos, which coupled with responsive trial staff, were suggested to provide a seamless enrolment experience. This study demonstrates that social media recruitment can be an effective and acceptable component of a multi-route strategy for clinical trial enrolment.

Indexed as

Acne VulgarisClinical Trials as TopicDermatologyPatient SelectionResearch SubjectsSocial MediaAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleSeverity of Illness IndexTime FactorsYoung AdultAcneOnline recruitmentRandomised controlled trialRecruitmentRetention dermatologySocial media

Identifiers

PMID40866885
PMCPMC12392518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.