ArticleBMC neurology2025
The global patent landscape of the drugs for treating Alzheimer's disease from 2014-2023.
Article in BMC neurology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAlzheimer's Disease (AD) is a complex neurodegenerative disorder lacking a definitive cure, spurring global efforts to develop effective therapeutic agents. Patent data can provide critical insights into research investments, innovation trends, and market dynamics.
objectiveThis study offers a comprehensive ten-year overview (2014-2023) of granted AD drug patents, focusing on patent families (A 'patent family' refers to a set of patents or patent applications in different jurisdictions claiming priority to the same original invention. In contrast, a 'patent' typically denotes a single jurisdiction-specific grant. When we aggregate data by families, we seek to avoid double-counting the same invention filed in multiple regions and to measure an invention's overall global protection strategy.) to consolidate international filings for the same invention. By highlighting top assignees, citation impact, and molecular targets, we aim to clarify current R&D directions and identify emerging opportunities in AD drug development.
methodsWe extracted 2,088 AD drug patent families from the IncoPat database using International Patent Classification (IPC) codes (A61K, A61P) and keyword searches ("Alzheimer" or "Alzheimer's disease"). We excluded irrelevant items (e.g., test reagents) and concentrated on legally granted patents to ensure reliable and enforceable innovations. Geographic layouts, applicant rankings, and citation analyses were conducted to reveal innovation hotspots and high-impact patents.
resultAnnual granted patent volumes remained stable until a slight decline after 2021. While large pharmaceutical companies (e.g., Hoffmann-La Roche) dominated in terms of total patent families, several highly cited patents originated from smaller or less prolific applicants, reflecting unique or foundational breakthroughs. The United States led in patent counts, yet notable growth was seen in China and other emerging markets. Small-molecule compounds (including isoindoline derivatives) and monoclonal antibodies were predominant targets, though gene therapy and neuroinflammation-focused patents also gained traction.
conclusionsOur findings highlight how AD patent landscapes integrate multiple scientific pathways and commercial strategies. The discrepancy between top patentees and top-cited inventions underscores the multifaceted nature of innovation in AD therapeutics. These insights, combined with broader scientific context, may guide policy decisions, R&D collaborations, and future research priorities in tackling this urgent healthcare challenge.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.