ArticleBMC public health2025
Acceptability of cool roofs: a qualitative study in Nouna, Burkina Faso.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- "The heat really troubles us": community perspectives on a cool roof intervention, Umlazi, KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.Frontiers in climate · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundStructural passive cooling interventions such as cool roofs are used to reduce indoor ambient temperature. However, it is unknown how acceptable and desirable cool roof technology is in rural low-income settings in sub-Saharan Africa, where home occupants are exposed to rising indoor temperatures.
methodsWe engaged 48 participants in four focus group discussions to explore the factors influencing the acceptability of "cool roofs" in Nouna, Burkina Faso. We analysed the data using reflexive thematic analysis. We structured our findings using the acceptability framework developed by Sekhon, Cartwright and Francis (2017), which comprises seven components: affective attitude, burden, perceived effectiveness, ethicality, intervention coherence, opportunity costs, and self-efficacy.
resultsOur participants described an environment of extreme heat and the need for adaptation strategies to reduce the temperature within their homes. The cool roofs would be deemed acceptable if they were affordable, effective in reducing heat, and aligned with values around self-efficacy, particularly in relation to local production and ownership.
conclusionProviding communities with technical information regarding how the cool roof functions and can be maintained may support uptake via acceptability. Desirability of the roof may be achieved via a combination of highlighting the indoor cooling of the roof as reported by users, sharing of results with the community so that they have an insight into the effects of the roof, and feedback regarding the products useability and durability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.