ArticleBMC primary care2025
Scaling up the task-sharing of an evidence-based psychological treatment for depression in rural India: an implementation study.
Article in BMC primary care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluating the costs of developing a digital supervision tool for task-shared depression care: findings from a multi-site study in India.BJPsych open · 2026Article
- What helps and what hinders? Perspectives of perinatal women and healthcare providers on perinatal mental health screening in a metropolitan city in Southern India.BMC health services research · 2026Article
- Acceptability of a digital program for training community health workers in the early detection and referral of schizophrenia in rural India: A mixed-methods pilot study.SSM. Mental health · 2026Article
- A Conversational Agent (PracticePal) to Support the Delivery of a Brief Behavioral Activation Treatment for Depression in Rural India: Development and Pilot-Testing Study.JMIR formative research · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundMajority evidence on task-sharing of psychological treatments for depression is focused on randomized controlled trials with project staff-delivered treatment. Ours is a scaling up of a brief evidence-based psychological treatment, Healthy Activity Program (HAP) by non-specialist providers (NSPs) -Accredited Social Health Activists (ASHAs) in rural India. Objectives included testing the acceptability, feasibility and effectiveness of ASHA-delivered HAP, and to examine implementation outcomes using the RE-AIM (Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance) framework.
methodsASHA were recruited in three rural districts in Madhya Pradesh, India. During the study duration, 1001 ASHA completed training using the EMPOWER approach (digital curricula and supervision protocols); 458 ASHA went on to deliver the HAP to adults with depression screened opportunistically using the Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8). This paper describes the delivery of the HAP over a one-year period (24–07-2022 till 30–06-2023). The primary outcomes were treatment completion, patient and ASHA satisfaction, and change in depression symptom scores on treatment completion; whether treatment effects were sustained at long-term (i.e., 9 month) among a consecutively recruited follow-up sample (10% of the total participants (n = 246)); additionally, we applied the RE-AIM framework to analyse the implementation process and outcomes.
results94.3%(1001/1061) of the non-specialist providers (NSPs) completed the full training. 12.1% of the patients (2208/18195) 2208 patients were screened positive for depression and all 100%(2208) agreed to receive the treatment. A total of 13,008 sessions were delivered with a 97.82%(2160/2208) completion rate. We found substantial reduction in depressive symptom severity from baseline to immediate post-treatment [Cohen’s d = 2.52; 95% CI: 2.44, 2.61], which was sustained at 9-month follow-up [Cohen’s d = .96, 95% CI: 0.81, 1.11]. Patients with severe symptoms tended to remain symptomatic and stayed in treatment longer. Both ASHA and patients reported high levels of satisfaction. Reach, adoption and implementation fidelity were high, as mapped through RE-AIM, which also revealed multilevel facilitators and barriers to scale-up.
conclusionsThe scaling up of a brief evidence-based psychological treatment by existing frontline workers through digital platforms for training and supervision is associated with high levels of satisfaction, treatment completion and remission rates. The application of the RE-AIM helped in systematically documenting implementation learnings to inform future scale-up.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.