ReviewInternational journal of emergency medicine2025
Impact of telemedicine on mortality, hospital admissions, and length of stay in pediatric emergencies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in International journal of emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Telemedicine for new immigrant children in the US: a tool for equity or another layer of disparity?Frontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
- Review
- Correction: Impact of telemedicine on mortality, hospital admissions, and length of stay in pediatric emergencies: a systematic review and meta-analysis.International journal of emergency medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPediatric emergencies pose significant challenges in healthcare. Telemedicine offers a promising solution by enabling remote assessments, improving specialist access, reducing unnecessary ER visits and admissions, optimizing resources, and enhancing patient satisfaction. This systematic review and meta-analysis uniquely aimed to quantify the effect of telemedicine on key outcomes in pediatric emergency and post-emergency care.
methodsWe searched PubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to identify studies focusing on the impact of telemedicine in pediatric emergency settings. Both single- and double-arm studies were included. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan and CMA software, with a random-effects model applied to all analyses. We assessed differences in admissions, hospital length of stay (LOS), and mortality. Event rates were calculated for single-arm analyses, and risk ratios and mean differences were used for dichotomous and continuous outcomes in double-arm analyses.
resultsA total of 23 studies were included. Telemedicine significantly reduced hospital LOS (MD = -1.01, 95% CI: -1.3 to -0.71) and overall mortality (RR = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.13 to 0.24). The admission rates to the emergency department, hospital ward, and pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) were comparable between both groups. Single-arm analysis revealed that telemedicine was associated with an ED admission rate of 18% (95% CI: 5.2-47%), a hospital ward admission rate of 16.7% (95% CI: 4.6-45.7%), and a pooled mortality rate of 1.8% (95% CI: 1-3.3%).
conclusionsTelemedicine appears to be an effective tool in pediatric emergency care. While our analysis suggests reductions in hospital length of stay and mortality, these findings should be interpreted with caution due to variability and potential confounding across studies. The impact on admission rates remains inconclusive. Nonetheless, telemedicine offers a promising approach to enhancing healthcare delivery and optimizing resource use in pediatric emergency and early post-emergency settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.