ArticleInternational journal of emergency medicine2025
Determining the need for stabilising therapy of cervical spine injuries on CT: towards standardising decision-making in the emergency department.
Article in International journal of emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn clinical practice, currently no standardised approach exists to determine which patients with cervical spine injury (CSI) on CT scan should receive continued cervical spine immobilisation and a neurosurgeon is generally consulted. Insights into the contribution of CT assessment and classification of CSI in determining the need for stabilising therapy could aid in standardising clinical practice in the emergency department. Standardising clinical practice for cervical spine immobilisation could potentially improve the patient flow in the emergency department by reducing delay in decision-making, particularly in hospitals without availability of immediate neurosurgical consultation. Therefore the aim of this study was to investigate if CT assessment and classification of CSI, without clinical information, can determine whether a patients' injury is an injury in need of stabilising therapy (IST).
methodsIn this observational, retrospective study, a database with a multidisciplinary, extensively validated reference standard was used. Consecutive patients screened for CSI using CT (2007-2014) in a level-one trauma centre in the Netherlands were included. Actual therapy that has been provided was compared to the assessment of CSI by three neurosurgeons on CT for presence of ISTs. Clinical information was not provided during initial CT assessment. Injury types were classified according to the AOSpine Injury Classification System. Concordance rates of CT assessment by the neurosurgeons compared to actual therapy provided for presence of ISTs with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were calculated.
resultsOf the 273 patients in the database with a CSI, 262 were included. CT assessment of CSIs led to assignment as IST in 155/262 cases (59.2%). Based on the actual therapy provided, 124/262 cases (47.3%) were an IST. CT assessment by the neurosurgeons was concordant with the therapy provided for presence of ISTs in 91.9% [95% CI 85.3-95.9%], and for absence of ISTs in 70.3% [95% CI 61.8-77.6%]. After allocation of the AO-subtypes to IST and non-IST, 168/171 (98.2%) of A0-injury subtype cases were non-IST.
conclusionCT scan assessment and injury classification without clinical information allows identification of most injuries in need of stabilising therapy, with a low miss rate of ISTs, particularly for the A0-injury subtype.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.