Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40866769›Full record

ArticleMemory & cognition2026

Autobiographical memory retrieval in the context of self-schema updating: Does specific recall have power?

Noboru Matsumoto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Memory & cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Noboru MatsumotoDivision of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, Shinshu University, 3-1-1 Asahi, Matsumoto, Nagano, 390-8621, Japan. noborum@shinshu-u.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0001-7513-1476

Funding

Japan Society for the Promotion of Science 24H00494
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Self-schemas are formed from the common elements of past experiences. In clinical contexts, maladaptive negative self-schemas are associated with resistance to therapeutic interventions and prospectively predict a worse course of depression. One possible way to update self-schemas is to recall specific autobiographical events that support or contradict current self-schemas. This study investigated whether retrieving specific autobiographical memories facilitates self-schema updating more effectively than retrieving general memories or no memories. Additionally, the study explored whether depressive symptom severity was associated with memory accessibility biases. Undergraduate students (N = 101) completed an autobiographical memory task where they recalled specific memories in which they or their friend behaved consistently or inconsistently with adjective cues (e.g., competent, inferior). Participants rated how well these traits applied to themselves (i.e., assessment of self-schema) before and after the autobiographical memory retrieval. Results showed that retrieving memories in which participants behaved consistently or inconsistently with their traits led to changes in self-schema in the corresponding direction, and this effect was more pronounced when specific memories were recalled. Furthermore, shorter retrieval latencies for self-inconsistent memories were associated with greater changes in self-schema. Depressive symptom severity was associated with shorter retrieval latencies only in the condition where memories were inconsistent with positive self-traits and in the condition where they were consistent with negative self-traits. These findings highlight the utility of specific autobiographical recall in self-schema updating and suggest that interventions targeting autobiographical memory specificity may effectively address negative self-schemas, particularly in individuals with dysphoria.

Indexed as

DepressionMemory, EpisodicMental RecallSelf ConceptAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMaleYoung AdultAutobiographical memory specificityBelief updatingDepressionMemory accessibilitySelf-schema

Identifiers

PMID40866769
PMCPMC13133198

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.