ArticleMemory & cognition2026
Autobiographical memory retrieval in the context of self-schema updating: Does specific recall have power?
Article in Memory & cognition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Self-schemas are formed from the common elements of past experiences. In clinical contexts, maladaptive negative self-schemas are associated with resistance to therapeutic interventions and prospectively predict a worse course of depression. One possible way to update self-schemas is to recall specific autobiographical events that support or contradict current self-schemas. This study investigated whether retrieving specific autobiographical memories facilitates self-schema updating more effectively than retrieving general memories or no memories. Additionally, the study explored whether depressive symptom severity was associated with memory accessibility biases. Undergraduate students (N = 101) completed an autobiographical memory task where they recalled specific memories in which they or their friend behaved consistently or inconsistently with adjective cues (e.g., competent, inferior). Participants rated how well these traits applied to themselves (i.e., assessment of self-schema) before and after the autobiographical memory retrieval. Results showed that retrieving memories in which participants behaved consistently or inconsistently with their traits led to changes in self-schema in the corresponding direction, and this effect was more pronounced when specific memories were recalled. Furthermore, shorter retrieval latencies for self-inconsistent memories were associated with greater changes in self-schema. Depressive symptom severity was associated with shorter retrieval latencies only in the condition where memories were inconsistent with positive self-traits and in the condition where they were consistent with negative self-traits. These findings highlight the utility of specific autobiographical recall in self-schema updating and suggest that interventions targeting autobiographical memory specificity may effectively address negative self-schemas, particularly in individuals with dysphoria.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.