ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
Deep Learning-Based 3D and 2D Approaches for Skeletal Muscle Segmentation on Low-Dose CT Images.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evaluation of 2D and 3D nnU-Net models with two-label and three-label strategies for automatic segmentation and total metabolic tumor volume estimation of metastatic differentiated thyroid carcinoma on FDG-PET/CT.Japanese journal of radiology · 2026Article
- Impact of data augmentation size on deep learning-based third lumbar vertebra computed tomography skeletal muscle segmentation performance.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026Article
- Radiomics-Based Machine Learning for Sarcopenia Detection in Abdominal and Low-Dose CT.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Automated segmentation of skeletal muscle from computed tomography (CT) images is essential for large-scale quantitative body composition analysis. However, manual segmentation is time-consuming and impractical for routine or high-throughput use. This study presents a systematic comparison of two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) deep learning architectures for segmenting skeletal muscle at the anatomically standardized level of the third lumbar vertebra (L3) in low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans. We implemented and evaluated the DeepLabv3+ (2D) and UNet3+ (3D) architectures on a curated dataset of 537 LDCT scans, applying preprocessing protocols, L3 slice selection, and region of interest extraction. The model performance was evaluated using a comprehensive set of evaluation metrics, including Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95). DeepLabv3+ achieved the highest segmentation accuracy (DSC = 0.982 ± 0.010, HD95 = 1.04 ± 0.46 mm), while UNet3+ showed competitive performance (DSC = 0.967 ± 0.013, HD95 = 1.27 ± 0.58 mm) with 26 times fewer parameters (1.27 million vs. 33.6 million) and lower inference time. Both models exceeded or matched results reported in the recent CT-based muscle segmentation literature. This work offers practical insights into architecture selection for automated LDCT-based muscle segmentation workflows, with a focus on the L3 vertebral level, which remains the gold standard in muscle quantification protocols.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.