Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40866760›Full record

ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026

Ultra-Low-Dose CTPA Using Sparse Sampling CT Combined with the U-Net for Deep Learning-Based Artifact Reduction: An Exploratory Study.

Andreas Philipp Sauter, Johannes Thalhammer, Felix Meurer, Tina Dorosti, Daniel Sasse, Jessica Ritter, Yannik Leonhardt, Franz Pfeiffer, Florian Schaff, Daniela Pfeiffer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Andreas Philipp Sauter *Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Johannes Thalhammer *Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany. Johannes.thalhammer@tum.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5198-8571
Felix MeurerDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Tina DorostiDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Daniel SasseDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Jessica RitterDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Yannik LeonhardtDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Franz PfeifferDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Florian SchaffDepartment of Physics, TUM School of Natural Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
Daniela PfeifferDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, TUM School of Medicine and Health, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.

Funding

Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) and the Free State of Bavaria GRK2274
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This retrospective study evaluates U-Net-based artifact reduction for dose-reduced sparse-sampling CT (SpSCT) in terms of image quality and diagnostic performance using a reader study and automated detection. CT pulmonary angiograms from 89 patients were used to generate SpSCT data with 16 to 512 views. Twenty patients were reserved for a reader study and test set, the remaining 69 were used to train (53) and validate (16) a dual-frame U-Net for artifact reduction. U-Net post-processed images were assessed for image quality, diagnostic performance, and automated pulmonary embolism (PE) detection using the top-performing network from the 2020 RSNA PE detection challenge. Statistical comparisons were made using two-sided Wilcoxon signed-rank and DeLong two-sided tests. Post-processing with the dual-frame U-Net significantly improved image quality in the internal test set, with a structural similarity index of 0.634/0.378/0.234/0.152 for FBP and 0.894/0.892/0.866/0.778 for U-Net at 128/64/32/16 views, respectively. The reader study showed significantly enhanced image quality (3.15 vs. 3.53 for 256 views, 0.00 vs. 2.52 for 32 views), increased diagnostic confidence (0.00 vs. 2.38 for 32 views), and fewer artifacts across all subsets (P < 0.05). Diagnostic performance, measured by the Sørensen-Dice coefficient, was significantly better for 64- and 32-view images (0.23 vs. 0.44 and 0.00 vs. 0.09, P < 0.05). Automated PE detection was better at fewer views (64 views: 0.77 vs. 0.80, 16 views: 0.59 vs. 0.80), although the differences were not statistically significant. U-Net-based post-processing of SpSCT data significantly enhances image quality and diagnostic performance, supporting substantial dose reduction in CT pulmonary angiography.

Indexed as

ArtifactsComputed Tomography AngiographyDeep LearningPulmonary EmbolismRadiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-AssistedTomography, X-Ray ComputedAgedFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRadiation DosageRetrospective StudiesComputed tomography pulmonary angiogramConvolutional neural networkDose reductionPulmonary embolismSparse sampling

Identifiers

PMID40866760
PMCPMC13230382

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.