ArticleScientific reports2025
Simulation of electrical conductivity for polymer carbon nanofiber composites assuming an extended nanofiber by interphase depth and tunneling distance.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Estimation of electrical conductivity for polymer composites with carbon black nanoparticles by interphase depth, tunneling characteristics and network percentage.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Estimation of contact area among carbon black nanoparticles in composites by tunneling properties, interphase depth and contact number.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Degree of conduction transfer through incomplete interphases controlling the conductivity of carbon nanofiber composites.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Predictive modeling of conductivity for carbon black nanocomposites: influence of filler features, interfacial effects and network portion.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Modeling of conductivity for carbon black nanocomposites incorporating network concentration, interphase conductivity and tunneling dimensions.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Loos-Manas-Zloczower model has been simplified and developed for conductivity predicting in polymer carbon nanofiber (CNF) systems (PCNFs). Herein, CNFs surrounded by interphase and tunneling distance (λ) are considered as extended CNFs, and their resistance is calculated to determine the PCNF conductivity. The developed model is analyzed across various factors, and its predictions are compared to the actual conductivity of different samples. For instance, when λ > 8 nm, the PCNF conductivity is minimized to 0.01 S/m, whereas with a λ of 1 nm and a polymer tunnel resistivity of 50 Ω.m, the nanocomposite conductivity increases to 0.79 S/m. Thus, both tunneling space and polymer resistivity conversely manage the conductivity. Furthermore, the conductivity of the nanocomposite maximizes at 0.75 S/m with a minimum CNF radius of 30 nm and a supreme CNF length of 60 μm, which indicates that the thinnest and longest CNFs provide the uppermost PCNF conductivity. The predictions of the developed method show a good agreement with the real conductivity of various samples, confirming its validity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.