Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40866599›Full record

ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2025

Advancing gender equity in gynecology and obstetrics: perspectives from the German workforce.

Jasmin Neuhold, Frauke von Versen-Höynck

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jasmin NeuholdDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Frauke von Versen-HöynckDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Strasse 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany. vonversen-hoeynck.frauke@mh-hannover.de.ORCID 0000-0002-1924-5695

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeDespite the high proportion of women in medical education and clinical training, female physicians remain underrepresented in leadership and academic positions in Gynecology and Obstetrics in Germany. This study investigates structural and cultural factors contributing to this disparity and highlights trends in workforce composition and recognition in the field.

methodsWe conducted a descriptive, cross-sectional analysis using publicly available data from the German Federal Statistical Office and the German Medical Association (2004-2024), as well as database from the German Society for Gynecology and Obstetrics (DGGG).

resultsIn 2023, women comprised 73% of gynecologists in Germany. Female representation declined with advancing career stage. In 2024, 82% of resident physicians at German university hospitals were women, while they held 26% of department head positions in Gynecology and Obstetrics. Female membership in the DGGG reached 75%, with 40% on the executive board. In 2022, 65% of major awards went to men, while women received most poster and lecture prizes (61%) at the biannual conference.

conclusionsWhile gender diversity in the clinical workforce has improved, systemic inequities persist in academic and leadership domains. Addressing these requires structural reforms, increased transparency in recruitment and promotion processes, and targeted programs supporting women's professional advancement. Enhanced visibility, mentorship, and inclusive institutional policies are essential to ensure gender-equitable development in the specialty.

Indexed as

Gender EquityGynecologyObstetricsPhysicians, WomenAdultCareer MobilityCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansLeadershipMaleAcademic medicineDiversityGender equityGermanyLeadership disparities

Identifiers

PMID40866599
PMCPMC12589288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.