Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40866531›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Improving perceptions of cultivated meat and plant-based proteins in Singapore.

Chloe Yun Yi Tan, Yanyun Yan, Jacqueline Choo, Xiaotong Cai, Hafizah Yusri, Nalini Puniamoorthy, Mei Hui Liu, L Roman Carrasco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Chloe Yun Yi TanDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 14 Science Drive 4, Singapore, 117543, Singapore. chloetanyunyi@u.nus.edu.
Yanyun YanDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 14 Science Drive 4, Singapore, 117543, Singapore.
Jacqueline ChooDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 14 Science Drive 4, Singapore, 117543, Singapore.
Xiaotong CaiDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 14 Science Drive 4, Singapore, 117543, Singapore.
Hafizah YusriDepartment of Food Science & Technology, National University of Singapore, Science Drive 2, Singapore, 117542, Singapore.
Nalini PuniamoorthyDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 14 Science Drive 4, Singapore, 117543, Singapore.
Mei Hui LiuCampus for Research Excellence and Technological Enterprise (CREATE), Singapore, Singapore.
L Roman CarrascoDepartment of Biological Sciences, National University of Singapore, 14 Science Drive 4, Singapore, 117543, Singapore. dbsctlr@nus.edu.sg.

Funding

National Research Foundation Singapore NRF2020-THE003-0003
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Alternative proteins offer a promising solution to meet global nutritional needs while enhancing sustainability. However, their success hinges on consumers acceptance and willingness to include them in diets. While previous research identified key factors that affect acceptance, such as unfamiliarity, few studies have experimentally tested how targeted interventions can enhance acceptance, particularly in regions where novel proteins are commercially available (e.g. cultivated meat in Singapore). We conducted an experiment to assess changes in acceptance scores, attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control before and after a tasting session involving chicken nugget samples labelled as conventional chicken, plant-based, and cultivated meat. Participants were also exposed to information about the benefits of plant-based and cultivated meat benefits. Our results show that the acceptance score was highest for conventional chicken, followed by plant-based and cultivated meat. Notably, acceptance scores for cultivated meat increased only when participants received positive information and had direct tasting. Attitudes and perceived behavioural control towards choosing either plant-based or cultivated meat as a source of proteins also improved across all groups post-session. These findings highlight the role of exposure and information in promoting alternative protein adoption and demonstrate their potential value in bridging public knowledge gaps.

Indexed as

MeatPlant ProteinsAdultAnimalsChickensConsumer BehaviorFemaleFood PreferencesHumansIn Vitro MeatMaleMiddle AgedPerceptionSingaporeYoung AdultPlant ProteinsCell-cultured meatLab-grown meatNovel foodsSensory experimentSustainable dietsTheory of planned behaviour (TPB)

Identifiers

PMID40866531
PMCPMC12391545

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.