ArticleScientific reports2025
Improving perceptions of cultivated meat and plant-based proteins in Singapore.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Alternative proteins offer a promising solution to meet global nutritional needs while enhancing sustainability. However, their success hinges on consumers acceptance and willingness to include them in diets. While previous research identified key factors that affect acceptance, such as unfamiliarity, few studies have experimentally tested how targeted interventions can enhance acceptance, particularly in regions where novel proteins are commercially available (e.g. cultivated meat in Singapore). We conducted an experiment to assess changes in acceptance scores, attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioural control before and after a tasting session involving chicken nugget samples labelled as conventional chicken, plant-based, and cultivated meat. Participants were also exposed to information about the benefits of plant-based and cultivated meat benefits. Our results show that the acceptance score was highest for conventional chicken, followed by plant-based and cultivated meat. Notably, acceptance scores for cultivated meat increased only when participants received positive information and had direct tasting. Attitudes and perceived behavioural control towards choosing either plant-based or cultivated meat as a source of proteins also improved across all groups post-session. These findings highlight the role of exposure and information in promoting alternative protein adoption and demonstrate their potential value in bridging public knowledge gaps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.