ArticleScientific reports2025
Evaluation of teicoplanin protein-binding variability and clinical utility of its free serum concentration measurement.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pharmacokinetic Model Based on Stochastic Simulation and Estimation for Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Teicoplanin in Korean Neutropenic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Management of teicoplanin (TEIC) therapy based on its free serum concentrations may be crucial for optimizing efficacy and safety. This study investigated the protein-binding variability of TEIC and evaluated predictive models for free TEIC concentrations in patients with various diseases. Additionally, effects of free serum TEIC concentrations on the efficacy and adverse event risk of TEIC therapy were analyzed. Free TEIC concentrations in sera from patients received TEIC treatment were determined via high-performance liquid chromatography followed by ultrafiltration. Therapeutic efficacy was evaluated by monitoring the changes in the serum C-reactive protein levels and fever, and adverse events were evaluated by examining the renal and hepatic functions. No significant correlation was observed between serum albumin concentration and free TEIC percentage; however, free TEIC percentage showed significant interpatient variability. Notably, predictive models based on the serum albumin and total serum TEIC concentrations were inaccurate for patients with different diseases. However, measured free serum TEIC concentrations predicted the therapeutic efficacy and the adverse event risk. In conclusion, our results suggest that TEIC dosage management based on the measured free serum TEIC concentrations, rather than the total or estimated TEIC concentrations, improves the clinical outcomes of patients with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.