Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40866478›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Perspectives of adults aged 55+ on plant-based diets rich in protein.

Sophie L van Oppenraaij, Marije Putker, Anne van Schaik, Peter J M Weijs, Sjors Verlaan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sophie L van OppenraaijDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health, Sport and Physical Activity, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Dr. Meurerlaan 8, Amsterdam, 1067, SM, The Netherlands. s.l.van.oppenraaij@hva.nl.
Marije PutkerDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health, Sport and Physical Activity, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Dr. Meurerlaan 8, Amsterdam, 1067, SM, The Netherlands.
Anne van SchaikDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health, Sport and Physical Activity, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Dr. Meurerlaan 8, Amsterdam, 1067, SM, The Netherlands.
Peter J M WeijsDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health, Sport and Physical Activity, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Dr. Meurerlaan 8, Amsterdam, 1067, SM, The Netherlands.
Sjors VerlaanDepartment of Nutrition and Dietetics, Faculty of Health, Sport and Physical Activity, Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences, Dr. Meurerlaan 8, Amsterdam, 1067, SM, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An increased protein intake is required during aging to preserve muscle mass. A predominantly plant-based diet is beneficial for the climate and may lower the risk of certain non-communicable diseases, but could also lead to protein below recommendations. This study seeks to elucidate facilitators and barriers in adults aged 55+ adopting a diet that is both predominantly plant-based and provides sufficient protein to preserve muscle mass. Three focus groups were conducted with 30 Dutch adults, aged 55-74 years. The focus groups explored participants' views on protein-rich, (predominantly) plant-based diets. Participants discussed a range of topics, including perceptions of protein needs, attitudes toward plant-based foods, social influences, and practical considerations such as taste, cost, and habits. Three researchers independently thematically analysed the data and facilitators and barriers were mapped to the Capability (C), Opportunity (O), Motivation (M) - Behaviour (B) model. Health effects (M) and taste (M) were both the most dominant facilitators and barriers regarding transition towards a more plant-based, protein-rich diet. Knowledge (C) and social influences (O) were important factors that influence dietary choices regarding the other COM-B model components. Environmental benefits (M) and animal welfare (M) were mentioned as additional benefits rather than as main facilitator. Participants expressed a clear need for enhanced knowledge and tools about the health and environmental benefits of plant-based, protein-rich diets. Improving taste and highlighting health benefits are key to fostering positive attitudes and encouraging the adoption of protein-rich, plant-based diets among adults aged 55+.

Indexed as

Dietary ProteinsDiet, VegetarianAgedDiet, Plant-BasedFemaleFocus GroupsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansMaleMiddle AgedDietary ProteinsBehaviour changeFocus groupsHealthy agingMuscle preservationPlant-based dietProtein intake

Identifiers

PMID40866478
PMCPMC12391368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.