ArticleScientific reports2025
Pain modulation by self-generated expectations.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pain perception is an individual and complex process, influenced by biological, social, and psychological factors via top-down modulatory pathways. One factor which plays an important role in pain perception is expectations, which have been popularly examined in placebo and Hyperalgesia studies, showing that pain perception can be modulated by manipulating expectations of treatments, pain stimuli or outcome. This preregistered EEG study provides compelling evidence for the high efficacy of self-generated expectation in modulating pain perception in direct comparison to externally induced expectation in a typical placebo paradigm. 42 participants were asked to generate expectations based on visual cues towards a subsequent pain stimulus and either lighten, enhance, or not actively influence their pain expectation. The behavioural results showed that pain perception was significantly altered by self-generated expectations, and that all three conditions differed significantly from each other regarding the reported pain. Notably, self-regulation produced more pronounced effects than externally induced expectations in direct comparison to the results of a previous placebo interventions using the identical experimental layout, indicating that deception is unnecessary for effective pain modulation. EEG analyses revealed differential neural processing among conditions, particularly within gamma-band activity linked to pain perception, underscoring the influence of self-generated expectations on neural responses. These findings provide evidence that even expectations created on a voluntary basis directly influence pain perception, and that manipulating strategies used in placebo studies such as conditioning, verbal instructions and observational learning may not be necessary to evoke the described effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.