Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40866472›Full record

ReviewCommunications chemistry2025

Exploiting the coordination chemistry of high-valent americium for actinide/lanthanide separations.

Bin Li, Lin Zhang, Huaixin Hao, Yishi Yu, Yuxiao Guo, Zhipeng Wang, Chao Xu

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Communications chemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Bin LiInstitute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Tsinghua University, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
Lin ZhangInstitute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Tsinghua University, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
Huaixin HaoInstitute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Tsinghua University, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
Yishi YuInstitute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Tsinghua University, Haidian District, Beijing, China.
Yuxiao GuoInstitute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Tsinghua University, Haidian District, Beijing, China. guoyx@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-5305-8064
Zhipeng WangInstitute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Tsinghua University, Haidian District, Beijing, China. wangzhipeng@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn.
Chao XuInstitute of Nuclear and New Energy Technology, Tsinghua University, Haidian District, Beijing, China. xuchao@tsinghua.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5539-4754

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 22325603National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 22376116
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Efficient americium (Am)/lanthanide (Ln) separation is highly pursued in advanced nuclear fuel cycle for minimizing the long-term radiotoxicity of nuclear waste and maximizing the utilization of nuclear resources. However, such a task is extremely challenging given the chemical similarity between the inherent thermodynamically stable Am(III) and Ln(III) ions. In recent years, interest in Am/Ln separation through oxidizing Am(III) to higher-valent states is reigniting due to theoretically considerable separation efficiency of this approach. This review summarizes the developments in preparation and stabilization of high-valent Am, especially the progresses in the exploitation of the coordination chemistry of these high-valent Am for effective Am/Ln separation. This review aims to inspire the search for efficient redox and coordination systems with more robust Am/Ln separation performance.

Identifiers

PMID40866472
PMCPMC12391460

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.