ArticleScientific reports2025
Biomechanical analysis reveals hormonal crosstalk in inflorescence bending of cut stock flower.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In cut stock (Matthiola incana L.), inflorescence bending is primarily caused by the bending moment generated by the weight of the floral structure. This phenomenon results in drooping of inflorescence onto neighboring plants, diminishing ornamental quality and increased space requirements among plants. Reduction of the bending moment increases the inflorescence's curvature radius, limits apical deviation and enables more compact plant spacing. This study investigated the individual and interactive effects of three auxins (IAA, NAA and IBA) and three cytokinins (KIN, BA and ZT), each applied three times beginning at the 10-leaf stage and repeated at 7-day intervals at the concentrations of 0, 10 and 100 ppm. Treatments were evaluated through a series of nine factorial experiments. Of the 81 auxin-cytokinin combinations tested, 15 treatments completely prevented inflorescence bending by producing upright stems. The effective treatments significantly reduced the length-to-diameter ratio (LDR) (p < 0.05), which was strongly correlated with both apical deviation (δ) and bending stress. LDR had a greater influence on δ than the stem's Young's modulus (E), suggesting that hormonal crosstalk primarily affected stem geometry rather than material stiffness. Notably, combinations of IBA with either KIN or ZT improved biomechanical stability by lowering the center of gravity, and shortening the torque arm, thereby reducing bending stress below critical levels. Treatments containing BA were associated with higher E and mechanical resistance index (MRI), indicating enhanced stem stiffness. Among the most effective combinations, IAA 10 ppm + BA 10 ppm yielded the most visually desirable inflorescences-long, straight stems with ideal floret arrangement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.