ArticleScientific reports2025
Sentiment analysis with echo state network and augmented water cycle algorithm.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sentiment analysis using machine learning has become increasingly popular and has received considerable attention in recent years. The sentiment analysis is a critical and challenging task, which require networks with high accuracy. This study utilized the IMDb movie reviews dataset, which comprises 50,000 English reviews (25,000 designated for training and 25,000 for testing) with an equal distribution of positive and negative classes. The dataset's unique characteristics, such as spelling errors, varying text lengths, and abbreviations, necessitate a multi-phase and unconventional approach to sentiment analysis. The data was thoroughly preprocessed, which involved eliminating unwanted characters, correcting slang, removing stop words, tokenizing, stemming, and performing part-of-speech tagging. To achieve this, this research implemented two separate word embedding models, GloVe and Word2Vec, for vectorization. In this study, Echo State Network (ESN) has been utilized, as there are two sentiments to consider, including positive and negative. In the following, this network has been optimized using Augmented Water Cycle Algorithm (AWCA), thus enhancing the hyperparameters. It was demonstrated by the outcomes that using GloVe could help the suggested ESN-AWCA accomplish the values of 96.37%, 96.39%, 95.87%, and 96.87% for F1-score, accuracy, recall, and precision, respectively. Moreover, utilizing Word2Vec helped the suggested model accomplish the values of 96.23%, 96.12%, 95.76%, and 96.71% for F1-score, accuracy, recall, and precision, respectively. Overall, the proposed ESN-AWCA model demonstrated strong performance with both word embedding methods and outperformed the other models evaluated in the study. The statistical validation, the p value of 0.001 and effect sizes d > 1.1, demonstrated the superiority of the suggested model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.