ArticleScientific reports2025
Urban coyote spatiotemporal overlap with humans is associated with environmental characteristics not human sociodemographics.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The tendency of wildlife to associate with humans spatially and temporally, i.e., to overlap with humans, is a key factor mediating human-wildlife coexistence in cities. While direct human influence (e.g., food subsidies) is recognized as a mechanism of wildlife overlap with humans, the role of broader urban ecosystem characteristics (e.g., habitat availability, human sociodemographics) in shaping this behavior is a burgeoning area of research. We analyzed the relationship between environmental and societal characteristics and overlap with humans in coyotes, a species of management concern due to emerging human-coyote conflicts in cities across North America. Using high-resolution GPS data from coyotes in the Chicago metropolitan area, we estimated overlap by quantifying coyotes' spatial selection for human population density during periods of temporal overlap, i.e., periods when coyotes and humans were active. On average, coyotes exhibited high overlap, evidenced by their selection for areas of high human population density during periods of temporal overlap, but with substantial individual variation in this selection. Importantly, the mean level of overlap depended on environmental characteristics. Selection for human population density was negatively associated with the level of impervious surface cover and positively associated with the presence of land uses containing natural habitat features (e.g., parks, golf courses, vacant lots). Coyote selection for human population density was not significantly associated with median income or the proportion of white residents. Our results suggest that natural habitat features in densely populated areas may be hotspots for human-coyote interactions. Efforts to manage human-coyote interactions should focus on these areas and identify individual traits that heighten coyote overlap with humans.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.