Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40866441›Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2025

Subcutaneous interstitial pressure measurement during early septic shock: an exploratory study.

Auguste Dargent, Isabelle Fournel, Marine Jacquier, Hugo Dumargne, Laurent Argaud, Jean-Pierre Quenot

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. From Glycocalyx Shedding to Microvascular Collapse in Sepsis: Endothelial Pathophysiology, Organ Dysfunction, and Mechanistic Biomarkers.Pathophysiology : the official journal of the International Society for Pathophysiology · 2026
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Auguste DargentLyon Sud Hospital, Anesthesia and Critical Care Department, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France. auguste.dargent@chu-lyon.fr.
Isabelle FournelCHU Dijon Bourgogne, INSERM, Université de Bourgogne, CIC 1432, Module Epidémiologique Clinique, Dijon, F21000, France.
Marine JacquierMedical Intensive Care Department, CHU Dijon, Dijon, Dijon, 21000, France.
Hugo DumargneLyon Sud Hospital, Anesthesia and Critical Care Department, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
Laurent ArgaudMedical Intensive Care Department, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Edouard Herriot Hospital, Lyon, 69003, France.
Jean-Pierre QuenotMedical Intensive Care Department, CHU Dijon, Dijon, Dijon, 21000, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fluid therapy is crucial in managing septic shock but may result in harmful fluid overload due to capillary leakage, causing interstitial fluid accumulation. Burns and endotoxemia models demonstrate that interstitium can reduce its hydrostatic pressure, increasing permeability, but this has not been clinically investigated in human sepsis. This study aimed to examine the changes in subcutaneous interstitial pressure (SIP) during sepsis. This prospective observational study involved adult patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) within 24 h, under sedation and mechanical ventilation, and who received < 50 ml/kg resuscitation. The septic shock group met the septic shock criteria, whereas the control group lacked sepsis or shock criteria (admission for non-traumatic coma). The SIP was measured using a subcutaneous transducer-tip probe. SIP was measured in 30 patients and was not significantly lower in septic shock: 1.69 ± 2.99 vs. 2.51 ± 2.39 mmHg in controls (p = 0.410). Among the 6 patients with a negative SIP, all but one were in the septic shock group, although the absolute difference was not significant (5 (33%) vs. 1 (7%), p = 0.169). Subcutaneous interstitial pressure was not significantly lower in septic shock patients, but sub-atmospheric SIP was more prevalent in this group, despite higher fluid balance. Further studies are required to clarify the role of interstitial pressure in capillary leakage during sepsis.

Indexed as

Extracellular FluidShock, SepticSubcutaneous TissueAdultAgedFemaleFluid TherapyHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPressureProspective StudiesFluid resuscitationInterstitial pressureInterstitiumSepsisSeptic shock

Identifiers

PMID40866441
PMCPMC12391332

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.