ArticleScientific reports2025
Electroencephalographic and clinical predictors of favorable neurologic outcomes in pediatric cardiac arrest survivors.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to identify neurologic prognostic factors after cardiac arrest in pediatric patients, focusing on clinical features and electroencephalography (EEG) findings. This is a retrospective single-center study. We analyzed resuscitated pediatric patients who admitted pediatric intensive care unit at a tertiary academic referral hospital in South Korea. Patients aged 1 month to 18 years with in-hospital cardiac arrest between January 2010 and October 2022 who received EEG within 7 days were included. The primary outcome was a favorable neurologic outcome, defined as a Pediatric Cerebral Performance Category score of 1-2, assessed at 6 months post-cardiac arrest. Sixty-two pediatric patients were included, with 16 (25.8%) achieving favorable outcomes. Multivariate logistic regression analyses identified initial shockable rhythm (p = 0.032), normal background voltage (p = 0.026), and continuous or nearly continuous background activity (p = 0.017) on standardized EEG as significant predictors of favorable neurologic outcomes at 6 months. The combination of an initial shockable rhythm with normal voltage or continuous EEG background enhanced prognostic accuracy (specificity = 100%). This study suggests that specific EEG background patterns-alpha frequency, normal voltage, and continuous or nearly continuous activity-within 1 week post-return of spontaneous circulation serve as indicators of favorable 6-month neurologic outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.