ArticleScientific reports2025
Predictive analysis of concrete tensile strength using metaheuristic algorithms helping a neural network.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In most construction projects, concrete is a widely used material in different structural elements due to its suitable mechanical behavior. Therefore, it is crucial to achieve a dependable estimation of the concrete mechanical parameters such as tensile strength. In this research, a well-known machine learning model-multi-layer perceptron neural network (MLPNN)-is optimized by multi-tracker optimization algorithm (MTOA) to avoid computational insufficiencies. The model predicts the splitting tensile strength of concrete based on the features of the concrete mixture. For validation, MTOA is compared to multi-verse optimizer (MVO), crow search algorithm (CSA), and backtracking search algorithm (BSA). Primary results showed that all optimized ANNs can reliably understand and predict the tensile strength pattern. However, from accuracy comparison, MTOA-MLPNN > MVO-MLPNN > CSA-MLPNN > BSA-MLPNN, based on respective percentage errors of 10.75, 11.28, 13.70, and 14.58, as well as correlation coefficients of 0.92, 0.90, 0.87, and 0.83. Moreover, the computational cost of the MTOA-MLPNN was found to be lower than the mentioned benchmarks. In addition, this model was validated using 10-fold cross-validation, and also its accuracy surpassed several models from earlier literature. All in all, the hybrid of MTOA-MLPNN created a scientifically novel and efficient predictive framework for the low-cost analysis of concrete tensile strength and mixture design.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.