Trial reportScientific reports2025
The effects of a concerning older adult abilities health education program to promote appropriate decision among acute myocardial infarction patients.
Trial report in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Older adults have the highest incidence of delayed treatment, complications, and deaths compared to other age groups. Nevertheless, knowledge and understanding about acute myocardial infarction, especially symptoms and perception of calling for 1669 (emergency services), are needed to inform care-seeking decisions during an acute myocardial infarction. This study aimed to explore the effectiveness of a health education program among patients with acute myocardial infarction. A single-blind randomized controlled trial was applied, and one hundred twenty-two hospitalized older patients with acute myocardial infarction were included between June 2022 and February 2023. The intervention group received a health education program and a handbook; the control group received routine care. The study outcomes were measured before and after receiving the intervention. Finally, t-tests, Mann-Whitney U test, Chi-square, Wilcoxon Signed Rank test, and adjusted analysis compared the outcomes. The 115 remaining for data analysis comprised 57 in the control and 58 in the intervention groups. We found that knowledge, perceived susceptibility, benefits of calling 1669, barriers, self-efficacy, cues to action, the possibility of calling 1669, and the first of action when having an acute myocardial infarction were improved. However, two patients in the control group (1455 min to make a decision), while only one in the intervention group (240 min), were readmitted. In conclusion, a health education program improves self-reported knowledge, belief, and decision-making. However, future research should investigate readmission rates and response times further. Finally, educational programs should be tailored to accommodate older adults' specific needs and limitations on clinical practice and research.Clinical Trial Registration Number: TCTR20220602001 on 02/06/2022.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.