ArticleScientific reports2025
Audio signal analysis using a modified forward-forward algorithm with enhanced segmentation for soil pest detection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The presence of pests in soil costs the agriculture industry billions of dollars every year since it reduces crop yields and raises preventive costs. The pest detection in soil is vital for maintaining healthy crops, optimizing pest management, and ensuring economic and ecological sustainability. There are several invasive and non-invasive methods available for pest detection, where invasive methods are costly as well as time-consuming compared to the non-invasive methods. From various non-invasive methods, audio-based pest detection in the soil is one of the effective, low-cost tools. The generation of pest sounds is random in nature and contains a lot of inactive and background noisy portions in the recorded sound signals. To reduce the unnecessary computations in analyzing the inactive portions, an improved audio activity detection algorithm has been designed in this paper using Short Time Energy features for segmentation, which provides an average of 20% less computational requirements as compared to the baseline models. In the second step, the Forward Forward Algorithm has been used for its benefits in enhanced numerical stability, simplified computations, and enhanced precision over traditional back propagation-based algorithms. For improved performance in the detection of pests in soil, the traditional FF algorithm has been further updated by using root mean square in the goodness and loss function calculation. Through the comparative analysis with several baseline models, it has been observed that the proposed method consistently provides an average of 5% enhanced performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.