ArticleBMJ open2025
Lithium versus cariprazine in the acute phase treatment for depressive episodes in patients with bipolar disorder: a protocol for a pragmatic open, randomised multicentre study - the 9th trial of the Danish University Antidepressant Group, DUAG-9.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05913947 (Lithium Versus Cariprazine in the Acute Phase Treatment of Bipolar Depression), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Lithium Versus Cariprazine in the Acute Phase Treatment of Bipolar Depression: a Pragmatic Head-to-head Open, Randomized Multicenter Study: The 9th Study of the Danish University Antidepressant Group (DUAG 9)
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionDepression is the dominant phase in bipolar disorder, but the available treatments are scarce. Lithium is a first-line option in several guidelines despite limited evidence, whereas cariprazine has a well-documented efficacy for depressive episodes. By comparing lithium and cariprazine in terms of efficacy and tolerability, we aim to contribute to an evidence-based positioning of lithium in future guidelines. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: An open label, randomised, multicentre, investigator-sponsored comparison of lithium versus cariprazine with a treatment duration of 8 weeks. Participants are aged 18-65 years and are suffering from a depressive episode as part of bipolar disorder, type 1 or 2. The primary outcome is the difference between the two groups in change from baseline to endpoint on Hamilton depression scale, 6 item version, based on the modified intention-to-treat population. Continuous variables will be analysed by using two-sided t-tests and mixed effects models. For categorical measures, χ ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Protocol has been approved by the regional ethical committee N-20220007 and European Medicines Agency. All participants provide written informed consent. The protocol was written according to Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials 2013 guidelines. Results will be disseminated in peer-reviewed international journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EU-CTR, 2024-517170-20-01; NCT05913947.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.