ArticleBMJ open2025
Pharmacological interventions in IgA nephropathy: protocol for a living systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIgA nephropathy (IgAN) is the most common primary glomerular disease in adults. In recent years, there have been many significant advances in treating IgAN, with multiple successful clinical trials. We aim to determine the comparative effectiveness of available pharmaceutical interventions for treating IgAN. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) will be conducted to assess the comparative effectiveness and safety of various pharmacological interventions available for adults with IgAN. All randomised controlled trials (RCTs) or quasi-RCTs which have evaluated pharmacological interventions in IgAN will be included. Both published studies and those available only as conference abstracts will be considered. A systematic literature search will be conducted using Ovid MEDLINE(R) ALL, Embase, Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Specialised Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), WHO International Clinical Trials Registry and ClinicalTrials.gov from inception to the present. Data extraction and risk of bias assessments using Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 will be performed by two reviewers independently, and differences resolved through consensus. Primary outcomes assessed will be kidney function and death, and secondary outcomes will be cardiovascular disease, other adverse events and patient-reported outcomes. The NMA will be conducted using a Bayesian NMA with Markov Chain Monte Carlo simulation methods in a random-effects model framework. The certainty of the evidence will be assessed using the Confidence In Network Meta-Analysis(CINeMA) tool to manage the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations(GRADE) assessment.After initial publication, the NMA will be maintained as a 'living model' in an open-source web application. A living 'auto-search' will be created and updated monthly to identify new evidence as it becomes available for synthesis. If new relevant studies are identified, after risk of bias assessment, data will be extracted and incorporated into the model, and findings will be updated accordingly. This will potentially provide a continuous overview of the rapidly changing therapeutic landscape of IgAN in the coming years and in future may help us to design 'living guidelines' for the management of IgAN. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The findings will be published in international peer-reviewed journals. No results are being presented in this protocol. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD420251050367.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.