Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40866059›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

A cross-sectional analysis of the link between tobacco use and marital living arrangements among Pakistani women: insights from Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey 2017-2018.

Mahreen Hirani, Sehar Tejani, Jawaria Mukhtar Ahmed

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Mahreen HiraniDepartment of Community Health Sciences, The Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.
Sehar TejaniDepartment of Community Health Sciences, The Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan sehar.tejani23@alumni.aku.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-5448-0786
Jawaria Mukhtar AhmedDepartment of Community Health Sciences, The Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3545-0808

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo examine the association between tobacco use and marital living arrangements among married women in Pakistan using data from the 2017-2018 Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey (PDHS).

designCross-sectional secondary analysis of nationally representative survey data.

settingThe analysis used data from 561 clusters across all regions of Pakistan, collected through a complex stratified sampling design.

participantsA total of 11,669 married women aged 15-49 years with complete information on tobacco use and living arrangements. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURE: Self-reported current use of any tobacco product.

resultsNo significant association was found between marital living arrangement and tobacco use (adjusted prevalence OR (aPOR), 0.969; 95% CI, 0.585 to 1.605). However, higher odds of tobacco use were associated with being illiterate (aPOR, 1.51; 95% CI, 1.05 to 2.16), having more children (aPOR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.14) and, living in Baluchistan (aPOR, 4.98; 95% CI, 2.20 to 11.26).

conclusionsLiving arrangements were not significantly associated with tobacco use, sociodemographic and reproductive health indicators showed strong associations. Interventions should target illiteracy, reproductive stress and region-specific behaviours.

Indexed as

Family CharacteristicsMarriageResidence CharacteristicsTobacco UseAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth SurveysHumansMiddle AgedPakistanPrevalenceYoung AdultAwarenessEPIDEMIOLOGYPUBLIC HEALTHTobacco Use

Identifiers

PMID40866059
PMCPMC12410645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.