ArticleBMJ open2025
Key informant perspectives on pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing for antidepressant prescribing in primary care in Ontario, Canada: a qualitative description study.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesMany patients with major depressive disorder must try multiple antidepressants before they identify a drug that is both effective and tolerable. Pharmacogenomic (PGx) testing may provide clinicians with guidance around medication choice based on a patient's drug response-related genetic variants. However, this technology is not routinely used in clinical care in Canada, and the views of key actors in the implementation process are largely unknown. The objective of this study was to qualitatively elicit the perspectives and attitudes of clinicians, scientists, policy actors and members of industry about PGx testing to guide antidepressant prescribing in primary care via interviews to help inform implementation policies for this technology.
designWe conducted a qualitative description study. Data analysis proceeded in parallel with data collection and consisted of an inductive qualitative content analysis.
settingThe focus of this study was implementation of PGx testing in primary care in Ontario, Canada.
participantsWe conducted semistructured interviews with 28 individuals who had professional experience relevant to the implementation of PGx testing for depression care ('key informants'). Geographical limits for recruitment were applied based on the transferability of key informants' expertise to the Ontario setting; included participants worked in Canada, the USA and Europe.
resultsParticipants described views about PGx testing relating to benefits and harms of this technology; their interpretation of the evidence base; implementation-oriented considerations and industry involvement. Overall, participants spoke enthusiastically about PGx testing, but emphasised genetic information is only one component of decision-making about medication prescription. Most endorsed implementation in primary care and felt a pre-emptive approach to testing would be ideal.
conclusionsKey informants consider the use of PGx testing to guide antidepressant prescribing in primary care as having both patient-level and system-level benefits. Concerns raised centred primarily around clinician education and barriers to access. Future research should focus on questions relating to feasibility of system-wide implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.