ArticleBMJ open2025
Cultural models within general practice/family medicine training: a scoping review protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- A model for professional nurses to facilitate culturally sensitive nursing care for children.Curationis · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCultural competency, cultural safety, cultural humility and transcultural care have developed as frameworks to better equip medical professionals towards a more culturally appropriate healthcare system. The aim of this scoping review is to map the use of these cultural models within general practice/general practitioner (GP) training. We have elected to use the term 'GP' to encompass all trainee doctors within general practice/family medicine. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the Scoping Review Methods Manual by the Joanna Briggs Institute and the Arksey and O'Malley framework for scoping studies and reported using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. Searches were conducted in EMBASE, MEDLINE and Web of Science Core Collection, with the support of a subject librarian. Published literature on cultural competence, cultural safety, cultural humility and transcultural care related to GP training will be included. There will be no restriction placed on language. References will be managed on EndNote, and titles and abstracts will be screened against the inclusion criteria by two independent reviewers. Potentially relevant sources will be retrieved in full and their citation imported into Rayyan. Data will be extracted on the year, type of study, country or countries of affiliated authors, characteristics of participants, research design and setting, cultural model being examined, definitions used, attitudes, outcome and application of the model, and purpose of the study. We aim to use basic qualitative content analysis for data extracted to map the landscape of the published literature around cultural competence, cultural humility, cultural safety and transcultural care. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was not required for this Scoping Review protocol. Findings will be disseminated through conference presentations and publication in a scientific journal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.