Observational studyBMJ (Clinical research ed.)2025
Second cancers in 475 000 women with early invasive breast cancer diagnosed in England during 1993-2016: population based observational cohort study.
Observational study in BMJ (Clinical research ed.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Factors influencing information overload among breast cancer patients in the information explosion era: a cross-sectional study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026Article
- Dual radiation-induced sarcomas after breast cancer in a TP53 variant carrier.Familial cancer · 2026Review
- Estrogen receptor-positive, BRCA1-deficient breast cancer: BRCA1-epimutated tumors presenting a piece to the puzzle.Breast cancer research : BCR · 2026Review
- Clinical Characteristics and Long-Term Outcomes of Young Women With Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Study From Uruguay.Cureus · 2026Article
- Case Report: Anti-PD-1 therapy as a catalyst for the rapid transformation of a hepatic nodule into HCC: a "soil and seed" paradox in metachronous triple primary malignancies?Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo describe long term risks of second non-breast primary cancers and contralateral breast cancers among women with early invasive breast cancer after primary surgery.
designPopulation based observational cohort study.
settingRoutinely collected data from the National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service for England.
participantsAll 476 373 women with breast cancer as their first invasive (index) cancer registered in England from January 1993 to December 2016 with follow-up until October 2021.
main outcome measuresRates and cumulative risks of subsequent primary cancers, compared with those occurring in the general population; associations with characteristics of patients, index tumours, and adjuvant treatments.
resultsAlthough 64 747 women developed a second primary cancer, the absolute excess risks compared with risks in the general population were small. By 20 years, 13.6% (95% confidence interval 13.5% to 13.7%) of women had developed a non-breast cancer, 2.1% (2.0% to 2.3%) more than expected in the general population, and 5.6% (5.5% to 5.6%) had developed a contralateral breast cancer, 3.1% (3.0% to 3.2%) more than expected. The absolute excess risk of contralateral breast cancer was greater in younger than in older women. Among specific types of non-breast cancer, the largest 20 year absolute excess risks were for uterine and lung cancers. Although for cancers of the uterus, soft tissue, bones and joints, and salivary glands, as well as acute leukaemias, standardised incidence ratios exceeded those of the general population by a factor of at least 1.5, absolute excess risks at 20 years were <1% for every individual non-breast cancer type. When patients were categorised according to adjuvant treatment, radiotherapy was associated with increased contralateral breast and lung cancer, endocrine therapy with increased uterine cancer (but reduced contralateral breast cancer), and chemotherapy with increased acute leukaemia. These were consistent with effects reported in randomised trials, but positive associations for soft tissue, head and neck, ovarian, and stomach cancers were also identified, and these have not previously been observed in trials. This suggested that approximately 2% of all the 64 747 second cancers and 7% of the 15 813 excess second cancers in the cohort may be attributable to adjuvant therapies.
conclusionsThe risk of a second primary cancer in women treated for early invasive breast cancer is slightly higher than for women in the general population. Contralateral breast cancer accounts for around 60% of the overall increase, with higher risks in younger women. The risk associated with adjuvant therapies is small.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.