ArticleBJGP open2026
Distribution and quality of privately-funded general practices in England: a cross-sectional analysis.
Article in BJGP open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPublic surveys indicate demand for privately funded general practice services in England has increased. However, little is known regarding the number, location, and quality of private general practices.
aimTo examine: (1) the geographical distribution of private general practices across England; (2) the relationships between access, continuity of care, and funding of NHS general practices with nearby private practices; and (3) the quality ratings of NHS and private general practices. DESIGN &
settingCross-sectional analysis of NHS and private general practices in England as of April 2024.
methodWe used the Care Quality Commission (CQC) Primary Medical Services Inspectorate to identify all private general practices in England. We used multilevel logistic regression to examine associations between NHS practice characteristics and the presence of a private general practice nearby. We then compared available CQC ratings.
resultsAs of April 2024, England had 358 private and 5976 NHS practices. Private general practices are primarily in London and other urban areas. NHS practices with higher patient satisfaction with waits for appointments (odds ratio [OR] 1.08 [95% confidence interval {CI} = 1.03 to 1.13]) and more GPs per 10 000 patients (OR 1.04 [95% CI = 1.01 to 1.06]) were more likely to have a private practice nearby. There was no association with continuity of care or funding. Quality ratings were similar, although 43.6% of private practices were unrated by the CQC.
conclusionPrivate general practices are more common in London, as well as areas with better access to NHS GPs. The growth in private general practices may have widened inequalities in access to primary care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.