Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40865929›Full record

ArticleApplied clinical informatics2025

Implementation of Passive Deterioration Index Alerts in an Intermediate Care Unit: A Failed Early Warning System Strategy.

Thomas F Byrd, Molly Mattson, Mary Polt, Katie Pint, Kiril Dimitrov, Angelica Willis, Julia Lister, Evan Beacom, Chris Tignanelli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Thomas F ByrdDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States.
Molly MattsonFairview Health Services, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States.
Mary PoltFairview Health Services, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States.
Katie PintFairview Health Services, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States.
Kiril DimitrovDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States.
Angelica WillisDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States.
Julia ListerDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States.
Evan BeacomDepartment of Medicine, Division of Hospital Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States.
Chris TignanelliCenter for Learning Health System Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States.

Funding

AHRQ HHS P30 HS029744The Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) P30HS029744
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traditional early warning systems (EWS) have shown uncertain efficacy in real-world settings. More recently, machine learning models like the Epic Deterioration Index (DTI) have been developed, promising greater accuracy. Recognizing the potential of DTI, but also the pervasive issue of alert fatigue with interruptive (i.e., pop-up) EWS alerts, our institution implemented a DTI-enabled EWS with passive alerts (colored icons visible in prespecified locations within the electronic health record). We hypothesized that our intervention would reduce the time to treatment for deteriorating patients.We piloted a DTI-enabled EWS in a 30-bed intermediate care unit at a large academic medical center. DTI scores, alert icons, and vital signs appeared on a custom Patient List interface. In the event of an alert, charge nurses were expected to conduct a bedside assessment and escalate care as necessary. We compared the 111-day pre- and postimplementation periods, with alert-to-action time as the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes included mortality, length of stay, ICU transfer, documentation rate, and provider acceptance.Among 301 patients with an elevated-risk score (156 pre- and 145 postimplementation), we found no significant differences in alert-to-action time (469 vs. 359 minutes before alert;

Indexed as

Clinical AlarmsClinical DeteriorationEarly Warning ScoreIntensive Care UnitsFemaleHumansMaleVital Signs

Identifiers

PMID40865929
PMCPMC12390366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.