Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40865854›Full record

ArticleBrain research2025

Natural visually guided behavior.

Mary Hayhoe, Constantin Rothkopf, Alexander Goettker, Nathaniel Powell

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Active gaze behavior organizes V1 activity in freely-moving marmosets.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mary HayhoeUniversity of Texas Austin, United States. Electronic address: hayhoe@utexas.edu.
Constantin RothkopfTechnical University of Darmstadt, Germany.
Alexander GoettkerJustus Liebig Universität Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
Nathaniel PowellUniversity of Texas Austin, United States.

Funding

VISUAL SENSITIVITY REGULATION &COLOR CODINGR01EY005729 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI HAYHOE, MARY M · 1985 to 2023
$7.0M
CPS Training ProgramT32EY021462 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI Mary M Hayhoe, Alexander C Huk · 2012 to 2026
$2.5M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY005729NEI NIH HHS T32 EY021462
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ultimate goal of vision research is to understand visual function in the natural world. However, the dominant approach has been reductionist. Different visual functions such as motion sensitivity, and depth perception have been considered separately in tightly controlled contexts. Similarly visual perception is typically considered independently of cognition and action. It is unclear the extent to which results from such experiments can generalize, an issue that has become one of increasing concern. How to approach natural vision is not obvious, however, given the diversity of natural behaviours and lack of theoretical contexts. In this paper we note that natural behaviour has many common features that can lend coherence to the issue. Visually guided actions can be considered as a sequence of decisions evolving in time that entail evaluating the state of an uncertain world, and choosing actions to satisfy behavioural goals, while taking costs and motor variability into account. This provides a unifying framework for investigating natural behaviour in more controlled conditions.

Indexed as

Psychomotor PerformanceVisual PerceptionAnimalsDecision MakingHumansDecisionsEye movementsNatural behaviour

Identifiers

PMID40865854
PMCPMC13289837

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.