ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology2025
Establishment of standardized definitions and a core set of outcome characteristics following hidradenitis suppurativa surgery developed by an expert Delphi consensus.
Article in Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
31 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition often requiring surgical intervention for definitive treatment. Previous studies evaluated postsurgical outcomes, but no standardization exists for collection and nomenclature for HS surgical outcomes.
objectiveTo characterize and define surgical outcome terminology.
methodsA modified Delphi protocol was used to reach consensus on data to collect and terms to describe outcomes following HS surgical procedures. A five-member steering committee created preliminary definitions and surveys, which were distributed via Qualtrics to a group of international HS experts. A nine-point Likert scale was used, and a score of at least 7 was needed for an item to reach agreement.
resultsTwenty-five dermatologists and general and plastic surgeons participated in the Delphi study. Following 2 rounds of surveys and feedback, the consensus terminology to describe outcomes included surgical site and regional persistence and progression. Consensus was also reached on key features to report as part of each outcome. LIMITATIONS: Limitations include narrow scope and small number of participants from limited geographical areas.
conclusionSurgery persistence and progression definitions were agreed upon by a group of international HS experts. This consensus is a first step toward standardizing terminology and reporting for HS surgical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.