Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40865413›Full record

ArticleEvaluation and program planning2025

Building capacity for health research in higher education: Evaluating readiness for research and scholarship.

Kelly A Laurila, Katharine Sanderson, Taylor S Lane, Diane Stearns, Derrick C Tabor, Julie A Baldwin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Evaluation and program planning, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Kelly A LaurilaResearch Scientist, Center for Community Health and Engaged Research, Northern Arizona University, USA. Electronic address: Kelly.Laurila@nau.edu.
Katharine SandersonRegistered Nurse, Special Care Nursery, Northern Arizona Healthcare, USA. Electronic address: Katharine.Sanderson@nahealth.com.
Taylor S LaneAssistant Research Professor, Center for Community Health and Engaged Research, Northern Arizona University, USA. Electronic address: Taylor.Lane@nau.edu.
Diane StearnsProvost & Executive Vice President for Academic Affairs, Tarleton State University, USA. Electronic address: Dstearns@tarleton.edu.
Derrick C TaborRetired Project Scientist (Formerly with the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, U54MD12388), USA. Electronic address: Dtab221@yahoo.com.
Julie A BaldwinRegents' Professor of Health Sciences, and Executive Director, Center for Community Health and Engaged Research, Northern Arizona University, USA. Electronic address: Julie.Baldwin@nau.edu.

Funding

SSCIMA: Integrating Analysis of Socio-economic Sub-population Dynamics to Improve Spatial Models of Infectious DiseaseU54MD012388 · NIMHD · NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY · PI Catherine R Propper · 2017 to 2026
$49.7M
Training/Career Development and Education Core and PlansU54CA143925 · NCI · NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY · PI JANI CHERI INGRAM · 2009 to 2026
$27.5M
Uranium as an Environmental Risk Factor for Cancer Among the NavajoU54CA143924 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA · PI Melissa Marie Herbst-Kralovetz, JUANITA L. MERCHANT · 2009 to 2026
$26.7M
NCI NIH HHS U54 CA143924NCI NIH HHS U54 CA143925NIMHD NIH HHS U54 MD012388
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This case study examines key components of research readiness for Doctoral Universities with High Research Activity (R2) through the lens of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) funded Research Centers in Minority Institutions (RCMI) program. While there are long-standing systems in place for ranking research institutions based on grant expenditures, there is a need to establish methods to evaluate institutions' readiness for externally funded competitive research. Drawing on literature across multiple disciplines and framed in alignment with the RCMI program goals, the authors developed a multidimensional instrument to examine research readiness centered on two primary domains (investigator and institutional readiness). The largest barriers to proposal development and conducting research/scholarship projects were managing time for competing expectations including scholarship, teaching, mentoring students, and service and recruiting skilled students who are prepared to assist the research process (respectively). Building research capacity requires research infrastructure, equitable distribution of institutional and grant resources, protected time for research, and focused areas research. Findings inform evaluation methods to assess research readiness, identify indicators and set benchmarks to measure changes in capacity and offer strategies for universities to enhance research capacity-building efforts and optimize institutions' ability to conduct NIH mission relevant research.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchCapacity BuildingEducation, GraduateFellowships and ScholarshipsHumansMinority GroupsNational Institutes of Health (U.S.)Program EvaluationResearch PersonnelResearch Support as TopicUnited StatesUniversitiesDoctoral University with High Research Activity (R2)Higher educationInstitutional cultureResearch capacityResearch Centers for Minority InstitutionsResearch infrastructureResearch readiness

Identifiers

PMID40865413
PMCPMC12452993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.